Category Archives: Polling

The Hot Senate Cycle

By Jim Ellis — Wednesday, March 19, 2025

Senate

Examining developing political events, we are already seeing the prelude to what might become the most competitive US Senate campaign cycle in decades.

Since Michigan Sen. Gary Peters (D) declared in late January that he will not seek re-election, three other Senators announced that they will also retire at the end of the current term. Depending upon the candidates each party fields, all of these newly open races have the potential of becoming expensive toss-up campaigns.

As we know, the other open seats are found in Kentucky (Sen. Mitch McConnell-R), Minnesota (Sen. Tina Smith-D), and New Hampshire (Sen. Jeanne Shaheen-D). Should the Kentucky Democrats convince Gov. Andy Beshear to run and likewise the New Hampshire Republicans recruit former Gov. Chris Sununu, these two states would certainly host major toss-up campaigns. Absent Beshear and Sununu running, each party would be favored to hold their respective seat.

Democrats expect to have the advantage in Minnesota, but it is unclear at this early point who their party will nominate. With Gov. Tim Walz (D) not running for Senate, Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan and former state Senate Minority Leader Melisa Lopez Franzen have announced their candidacies, while Rep. Angie Craig (D-Prior Lake) is listed as a possible contender. If Republicans can recruit a credible nominee, this open seat could transform into a competitive battle.

Perhaps the Republicans’ most vulnerable incumbent is North Carolina’s Thom Tillis; Democrats are trying to convince former Gov. Roy Cooper to enter that state’s Senate race. Like many others, Cooper is said to have presidential ambitions that could forestall a Senate challenge.

National Democrats would also like to see Maine US Rep. Jared Golden (D-Lewiston) challenge Sen. Susan Collins (R), but this is unlikely to happen. Golden is a former Collins staff member, and if he does run statewide it is more likely he will enter the open Governor’s race.

Two other Republican Governors are being recruited to run for the Senate, but it is unclear at this point if either will declare a bid. Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp and Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin would pair with Sens. Jon Ossoff (D-GA) and Mark Warner (D-VA), but there is no guarantee that either will make the move. Both have presidential aspirations and may not want to test their prospects for a national campaign in a Senate race where they stand a reasonable chance of losing.

Alabama Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R), reversing himself from his earlier statements and now saying he may well enter his state’s open Governor’s race, means we could see a very crowded, but determinative nominating campaign to succeed the Senator as the Republican nominee. Such an individual would then become a heavy favorite to win the general election, but the nominating process would be highly competitive.

Alaska Democrats would like to recruit former Rep. Mary Peltola (D) to challenge Sen. Dan Sullivan (R), but the lure of an open Governor’s race will likely be more tempting for Peltola.

Kansas Sen. Roger Marshall (R) stands for a second term next year, and the Democrats’ best potential candidate for this race is term-limited Governor Laura Kelly who cannot succeed herself. Kelly or Rep. Sharice Davids (D-Roeland Park) would be the Democrats’ best options for the Senate, but at this point there is little indication that either plan to run.

Expect, however, that Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee chair Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) will make a strong push to convince one of those two to enter the Jayhawk State Senate race.

Louisiana Sen. Bill Cassidy (R) is likely to also experience a competitive re-election race but not for the general election. With his state returning to a partisan primary system, Sen. Cassidy, for the first time, will have to face a strong Republican challenger before only Republican voters. One such individual, State Treasurer and former Rep. John Fleming (R), is already campaigning and leading in a late February poll (JMC Analytics; Feb. 26-28; 600 likely Louisiana Republican primary voters; Fleming 40 – Cassidy 27 percent).

Should Texas Sen. John Cornyn (R) stumble in the early 2026 Republican primary, Democrats would have a chance of putting Texas in play particularly if flawed Attorney General Ken Paxton becomes the Republican nominee. National Democrats would like to see 2024 Senate nominee and former Congressman Colin Allred run again.

Additionally, two appointed Senators, Florida’s Ashley Moody (R) and Jon Husted of Ohio (R) must run in special elections to fill the balance of the current terms and both will be expensive campaigns in large states.

If all of the most prominent potential candidates were to run in these 15 potentially competitive states, we would see a very volatile set of US Senate campaigns.

Chances are, however, the list of eventual nominees from both parties will be a bit more mundane than in the aforementioned outlined scenarios. Several of these big-name potential Senate contenders may be more inclined, like former US Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg who just bowed out of the Michigan race, to follow the presidential winds.

Florida: Donalds vs. DeSantis

By Jim Ellis — Monday, March 17, 2025

Governor

Florida First Lady, Casey DeSantis / Photo by Gage Skidmore

The first poll testing a potentially major battle between two national conservative movement factions was just released.

The impending open Florida Republican gubernatorial primary could feature the state’s First Lady, Casey DeSantis, whose incumbent husband Ron DeSantis is ineligible to seek a third term, and Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Naples) who already carries President Donald Trump’s endorsement.

At this point, Rep. Donalds is an announced gubernatorial candidate while Ms. DeSantis has yet to declare her intentions. Gov. DeSantis, however, has publicly hinted that she is at least considering running.

The Fabrizio Lee & Associates research firm went into the field to provide an early read on such a race. Their poll (Feb. 26-27 and released March 10; 600 likely Florida Republican primary voters; live interview & text) sees Rep. Donalds jumping out to a slight 34-30 percent lead over Ms. DeSantis. An additional three percent would support Agriculture Commissioner Wilton Simpson, who is also a potential GOP gubernatorial candidate.

The results get even more interesting when the respective endorsements are filtered. When the respondents are informed that President Trump publicly supports Rep. Donalds, the ballot test soars to 45-23 percent in the Congressman’s favor.

The contest changes when further information is shared. While it is certainly not surprising that Gov. DeSantis would endorse his wife but when the respondents are told that he will, the ballot test flips. The altered result projects Ms. DeSantis moving ahead of Rep. Donalds, 35-33 percent.

The caveat relating to the previous push question is the respondents were told of Gov. DeSantis’ endorsement of his wife prior to being informed of President Trump’s support for Rep. Donalds, and this situation is highlighted in the Fabrizio Lee analysis.

When all of the endorsement information is presented to the sampling universe, Rep. Donalds reassumes the lead at 38-28 percent over Ms. DeSantis with Simpson increasing to five percent support. Therefore, it is this last ballot test that should be considered the benchmark for future monitoring of this proposed race.

Whether this campaign actually transpires is another question. Ms. DeSantis has certainly not committed to running and is likely a long way from making a final decision. The 2026 Florida primary is not scheduled until Aug. 18, with a state candidate filing deadline of June 12. Therefore, much time remains to contemplate whether she will become an official candidate.

Certainly, the DeSantis decision involves more than calculating victory chances for the First Lady to succeed her husband. Since Ron DeSantis has national ambitions, the political analysis will involve just how much risk the family wants to assume in entering a campaign where a DeSantis could lose to a Trump-endorsed opponent.

At this point, the early presidential political climate doesn’t appear to positively favor a return appearance for Gov. DeSantis despite what should be his appealing record of accomplishment for a conservative voter base.

Since Vice President J.D. Vance is already considered the leading prospect to succeed President Trump as the next Republican nominee, he will be in an extremely strong position to capture the party nomination unless things go badly for the Administration toward the end of their current term.

Therefore, the 2028 presidential playing field will also factor heavily in deciding whether Casey DeSantis runs for Governor in 2026. In any event, we can expect to see the Donalds-DeSantis political drama continue over the next several months.

Buttigieg Says No to Senate Run

By Jim Ellis — Tuesday, March 18, 2025

Senate

Pete Buttigieg / Photo by Matt Johnson, Flickr

Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI) opting not to seek a third term has left the 2026 Michigan Senate race in a highly competitive open political mode. As we learned at the end of last week, however, one person who will not participate is former US Transportation Secretary and ex-presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg (D).

The former national cabinet official and ex-South Bend, Indiana Mayor publicly announced that he will not enter the Wolverine State Senate race despite leading in published polls. The one early released Democratic primary poll (Blueprint Polling; Jan. 30-Feb. 2; 536 likely Michigan Democratic primary voters; SMS text) found Buttigieg ahead of Attorney General Dana Nessel 40-16 percent but doing poorly within the important Black community in Detroit.

Rather, “Mayor Pete,” as he is often called, is apparently looking to follow the presidential winds, and his Michigan decision strongly suggests that he will be organizing another presidential campaign for the open 2028 national campaign when President Donald Trump will be ineligible to seek re-election.

Without Buttigieg in the Senate race, AG Nessel, who is ineligible to seek a third term for her current position, is a presumed top-tier potential candidate likely to be among those attempting to fill the Senate void. Congresswoman Haley Stevens (D-Birmingham) is also reportedly making moves to organize a Senate campaign as is state Sen. Mallory McMorrow (D-Royal Oak). Nessel’s weak poll showing against Buttigieg suggests that she is anything but a lock for her party’s nomination.

Several other names are being floated as potential Michigan Senate candidates including Republican former Congressman Mike Rogers who came within 19,006 votes of winning the state’s other Senate race last November. He lost to now-Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D) by three-tenths of one percentage point from over 5.77 million cast ballots.

Rogers, who is expected to run again, may have an impending GOP primary fight against a woman who lost the most recent Governor’s race by 10 percentage points, former steel company executive, national political commentator, and 2022 Michigan Republican gubernatorial nominee Tudor Dixon.

While Rogers moves to the right in hiring Trump co-campaign manager Chris LaCivita as one of his key consultants, a new Fabrizio Lee & Associates poll (Feb. 17-19; 600 likely Michigan Republican primary voters; live interview & text) suggests the former Congressman may not be the prohibitive favorite for the next GOP Senate nomination despite his impressive performance in the 2024 election.

The Fabrizio ballot test finds him trailing Dixon 40-36 percent in a hypothetical 2026 Republican primary poll. Among those saying their vote would be definite, the two are virtually tied with 22 percent saying they would definitely support Dixon and 21 percent indicating the same about Rogers.

Dixon, however, has been more closely tied to the open Governor’s race since incumbent Gretchen Whitmer (D) is ineligible to seek a third term. If she returns to again enter the state chief executive’s office campaign Dixon will likely face an equally difficult Republican nomination run against Rep. John James (R-Farmington Hills).

In 2018, James, as a first-time candidate, held veteran Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D) to just over 52 percent of the vote. Two years later, he came within less than two percentage points of unseating Sen. Peters. Now, Rep. James, who won his congressional seat in 2022 and was re-elected in November, looks to be preparing a run for the 2026 open Governor’s contest.

It is already clear that we will see many more twists and turns in the Michigan statewide races before reaching the August 2026 primary election. It is already clear, however, even in this early going, that Michigan, featuring both an open Senate and open Governor’s race for the first time in the modern political era, will be one of the top political states to follow in the coming months.

Michigan: Inconsistencies Galore

By Jim Ellis — Wednesday, March 12, 2025

Polling

The Target Insyght data organization, polling for the Michigan Information & Research Service (MIRS), released a new Wolverine State political survey, and the results are head-scratching to say the least.

The survey (March 3-6; 600 registered Michigan voters with over-samples of 344 Democratic voters and 336 Republican voters) produced results that are difficult to understand. While having a general election sampling universe comprised equally of Democrats and Republicans, it is unusual to see a Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson (D) in this case, posting a surprising 84 percent name identification while three-term Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan (I), who led a turnaround of a troubled city, recording only a 58 percent recognition factor.

Another conclusion finds Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) showing a 52:43 percent positive to negative personal favorability index while former Congressman and 2024 US Senate Republican nominee Mike Rogers is found with a rather dismal and inexplicable 23:46 percent index. This, from a sample fully half of which is comprised of Republican voters.

Yet, when the same sample was polled for a hypothetical open Senate contest between Gov. Whitmer and former Rep. Rogers, the ballot test result projected only a one-point 42-41 percent edge for the Democratic Governor. Comparing the favorability indexes for each candidate with the head-to-head ballot test result produces a highly inconsistent conclusion that brings the overall poll accuracy factor into question.

Parenthetically, Gov. Whitmer has made no mention of having a desire to run for the state’s open Senate seat now that Democratic incumbent Gary Peters has announced he will not seek re-election. Instead, it is obvious that she is looking to build a presidential organization for the 2028 open national campaign.

Though Rogers’ favorability index is a net minus 23 points, he still fares well on other individual ballot tests. In 2024, Rogers lost to now-Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D) by just 19,006 votes from just under 5.6 million cast ballots statewide. The aggregate polling also did not correctly depict the closeness of the end result, since Rogers trailed by a mean average of 2.3 percentage points and led in only one of 13 surveys conducted in late October through the November 2024 election.

In the current Target Insyght poll, Rogers trails former US Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg (D) by two percentage points, 46-44 percent. Using the two-point under-poll factor that we saw develop in the 2024 Senate campaign, the Buttigieg-Rogers race likely devolves into a dead heat. Again, this is a much different result than one would expect when looking at the personal favorability numbers.

The Governor’s ballot test result is also questionable. According to the TI data, Secretary of State Benson would lead Rep. John James (R-Farmington Hills) and Mayor Duggan, 42-30-21 percent in a hypothetical open general election campaign.

This is an odd result, since one would think Duggan, a Democrat until he announced as an Independent to run for Governor, would be drawing more from the Democratic base, especially in Detroit, than the Republican sector. Therefore, this split, meaning the Republican candidate is only getting 30 percent when the sampling universe is split 50/50, seems unrealistic.

Additionally, the Benson favorability index is 49:35 percent positive to negative as compared to Mayor Duggan’s 42:16 percent. This is further evidence that the ballot test result is contradictory with the personal favorability factors when seeing the latter ratio is a net 12 percentage points better than the former.

The Democratic gubernatorial figures also seem weighted in Ms. Benson’s favor. Here, she leads Lt. Gov. Garlin Gilchrest, Attorney General Dana Nessel, and Genesee County Sheriff Chris Swanson by a 55-12-12-3 percent spread. Pitted against two other statewide office holders, and one would guess the name ID metric is similar for all three, it is again surprising to see Benson holding such a commanding lead.

Obviously, the Michigan political situation will change greatly between today and late next year, and we will see many polls of the Wolverine State races. It is likely that the many inconsistencies found in this Target Insyght poll will be rectified through further research.

President or Senator?

By Jim Ellis — Tuesday, March 11, 2025

Governor

Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R)

A sitting Governor and a recently retired ex-state chief executive have key political decisions to make soon.

Both Gov. Brian Kemp (R-GA) and former Gov. Roy Cooper (D-NC) are reportedly weighing running for the Senate in 2026 and/or organizing a 2028 presidential campaign. Each says he is not yet ready to announce any future political plans.

A third Governor, Michigan’s Gretchen Whitmer (D), is in a similar position but she is more definitive about running for President in 2028, so it is highly doubtful that she will enter her state’s open 2026 Senate race.

Former North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper (D)

The two men are under intense pressure from party leaders to run for the Senate next year. Polling shows both Gov. Kemp, term-limited in 2026, and ex-Gov. Cooper, who was ineligible to seek a third term in 2024 because of North Carolina’s term limit law, leading their respective incumbent Senator of the opposite party, Jon Ossoff (D-GA) and Thom Tillis (R-NC).

The latest Georgia poll (WPA Intelligence; Jan. 14-15; 500 likely Georgia voters; live interview) projects Gov. Kemp topping Sen. Ossoff, 46-40 percent, while the other tested potential challengers, i.e., Reps. Buddy Carter (R-Pooler/Savannah), Rich McCormick (R-Suwanee), and Mike Collins (R-Jackson), all trail.

A new Public Policy Polling survey of North Carolina general election voters (March 4-5; 662 registered North Carolina voters) sees two-term Sen. Thom Tillis (R) beginning his re-election effort four points behind Cooper, 47-43 percent.

While it is typical to see a Republican trailing in a North Carolina poll – there is usually a two-point under-poll factor for GOP candidates in the state – a poor Tillis job approval ratio of 25:46 percent favorable to unfavorable according to the PPP data should be of obvious concern. Some of the disapproval is coming from Republican voters, however, who don’t believe Sen. Tillis has been sufficiently loyal to President Donald Trump.

Gov. Kemp says he understands the need to make a decision in the near future but will not do so until the Georgia state legislative session adjourns shortly after the beginning of next month. Kemp is also chairman of the Republican Governors’ Association, which he says significantly adds to his time commitments for the 2026 election cycle.

For his part, Cooper says he will make a decision about running for the Senate “in the next couple of months.”

For North Carolina’s Cooper, running for President may be an easier decision than for Gov. Kemp. In what will be an open 2028 presidential campaign for both parties, the Democratic field will be in free-for-all status because they do not have an incumbent Vice President. With the paucity of Democratic elected officials coming from the south, Cooper could reasonably build a southern strategy in the Democratic primaries that would make him a major factor with a large number of committed delegates.

For Gov. Kemp, the presidential road to the Republican nomination would be rockier since incumbent VP J.D. Vance should have the inside track to the 2028 party nomination. While sitting Vice Presidents have often not fared well in general elections, they have been near perfect in securing party nominations. With Vance already knowing the 2028 presidential campaign will be open, he would begin such a campaign with a major advantage.

At this point, however, since we usually don’t see recent Governors running for Senate because they often find the transition from an executive to being one of 100 in a legislative body difficult, it would not be shocking to see both men decline the Senate opportunity.

If so, the Georgia Republicans are ready with a political bench. Already the aforementioned three Representatives: Carter, McCormick, and Collins, are waiting in the wings to run for the Senate, and there are seven additional GOP statewide officers each with a winning electoral record.

In North Carolina, the Democrats have five sitting statewide officials, although two are unlikely to run for the Senate. Gov. Josh Stein (D) was just elected in November and probably would not give up his current position so quickly to run for the Senate.

Secretary of State Elaine Marshall, who was elected in 1996 when defeating NASCAR champion Richard Petty (R) and will turn 80 years old shortly after the November 2026 election, is another who will not run for the Senate.

The other office holders, including Lt. Gov. Rachel Hunt, the daughter of former Gov. Jim Hunt and an ex-Charlotte area state Senator, could become Senate candidates. The other statewide Democratic officials who were elected in 2024 and would have a 2026 free ride, are Attorney General and former Congressman Jeff Jackson and Superintendent of Public Instruction Mo Green.

In the US House delegation, Reps. Don Davis (D-Snow Hill/Rocky Mount), Deborah Ross (D-Raleigh), and Valerie Foushee (D-Hillsborough/Chapel Hill) could conceivably enter a US Senate race. Therefore, even without MCooper, the Democrats will have credible options with whom to challenge Sen. Tillis.

Regardless of who challenges the incumbent Senators in Georgia and North Carolina, both states will be on the 2026 political front burner.

Sununu Would Top Shaheen

By Jim Ellis — Wednesday, March 5, 2025

Senate

Former New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu (R)

A newly released statewide poll suggests that former New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu (R) would defeat Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D). This conclusion derives from a hypothetical 2026 US Senate survey that a Granite State media outlet sponsored. The poll also uncovered a Shaheen negative of which there is little she can do to reverse.

The political study, commissioned through the NH Journal online news site (conducted by Praecones Analytica; Feb. 26-March 1; 626 registered New Hampshire voters; online), finds Sununu topping Sen. Shaheen 54.4 – 45.6 percent. Obviously, respondents were pushed for an answer since the ballot test result reveals no undecided or won’t respond replies.

Whether such a race materializes must be considered unlikely. Sununu, while Governor, had been asked repeatedly about his interest in forging a Senate race, particularly against Sen. Maggie Hassan (D) in the 2022 election cycle, to which he consistently expressed little desire in becoming a Senator. This, even when he might have become the majority-deciding 51st Republican vote, which at the time, looked to be the number Republicans could realistically obtain.

New Hampshire Sen. Maggie Hassan (D)

Perhaps of more concern to Sen. Hassan than a potential pairing with Sununu, however, is the question relating to her age. Asked: “If re-elected, she would be 85 years old at the end of her term in office. How concerned are you that age would impact Sen. Shaheen’s ability to effectively serve New Hampshire?”

Over 60 percent of the New Hampshire respondents voiced trepidation. A total of 25.8 percent said they would be “extremely concerned,” while an additional 34.6 percent (a combined total of 60.4 percent) replied that they would be “somewhat concerned.” The situation surrounding former President Joe Biden’s last year in office spotlighted the issue of personal ability when reaching an advanced age according to the poll analysis.

The poll news, however, is not all bad for Sen. Shaheen. If paired in 2026 with former Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown (R), whom she defeated in 2020, Sen. Shaheen would lead 55.1 – 44.9 percent. If Commissioner of Education Frank Edelblut were her Republican opponent, Sen. Shaheen would post a 58.9 – 41.1 percent advantage.

Sen. Shaheen has yet to say whether she will seek a fourth US Senate term, she has only said that she will make a decision about running again in the next few months.

Her votes relating to the Trump cabinet member confirmations suggest that the Senator may be leaning toward running, since she was one of the more bipartisan members in terms of supporting the Republican appointees. In fact, she backed nine of the nominees, the most of any Democratic Senator, along with Sens. John Fetterman (D-PA) and Ruben Gallego (D-AZ).

The Shaheen situation concerns the Democratic leadership. Even though the party has the advantage on the overall 2026 Senate election map because the Democrats must defend only 13 seats as compared to the Republicans’ 22, the early developments have not gone their way.

With Sens. Gary Peters (D-MI) and Tina Smith (D-MN) announcing surprise retirement decisions, the Democrats must now add two more competitive open seats to their priority list. Should Sen. Shaheen retire or face former Gov. Sununu, even more resources that could be used to attack Republican-held positions would instead be diverted into increased defensive spending.

With Sens. Peters and Smith already deciding to depart, great attention will be paid to Sen. Shaheen’s upcoming decision. Depending upon how her situation unfolds, it is possible that New Hampshire could become another key 2026 battleground state.

Premature Polling Results

By Jim Ellis — Monday, March 3, 2025

Polling

President Donald Trump / Photo by Gage Skidmore

There are a number of current political studies surfacing that provide conflicting data or test political campaigns that clearly won’t happen. Yet, they still produce some marginally useful information.

The first set of contradictory surveys pertains to recent job approval ratings for President Donald Trump. The two polls in question produced diametrically opposed results when asking the same question during the same time period.

The American Research Group tested the Trump favorability rating over the Feb. 17-20 period (1,004 registered US voters; live interview) and found the President with an upside-down ratio, 43:51 percent favorable to unfavorable, a negative spread of eight percentage points.

Within the same time frame, Harvard University (HarrisX/Harris Poll; Feb. 19-20; 2,443 registered US voters; online) also tested the American registered voter electorate but found a completely different favorability ratio. According to the Harvard data, Trump has a positive rating spread of nine percentage points, 52:43 percent favorable to unfavorable.

Therefore, the two professionally conducted surveys, executed within the same period (Feb. 17-20), and targeting a like audience (registered voters) for the same purpose (testing presidential job approval) arrive at completely different responses.

It is probable that the more positive Harvard poll is closer to the accuracy mark, as another surveyor, the Morning Consult data organization, conducted a national tracking poll within the same late February period. The MC study (Feb. 21-24; 2,225 registered US voters; online) projects Trump with a plus-3 favorable job approval ratio, 50:47 percent.

The large disparity found within these and other similar conducted surveys over the weeks since President Trump began his second term on Jan. 20, suggest certain polling flaws or that the public is displaying inconsistent hot and cold tendencies toward the former and current chief executive. Even the latter potential conclusion, however, is an improvement when compared to the President’s first term standing when his approval ratings were uniformly negative.

A newly released campaign poll should be ignored, but not because the data results are necessarily wrong. The reason is one of the tested principals has definitively stated he is not running for the Senate.

The campaign in question is the 2026 Massachusetts Senate race featuring incumbent Sen. Ed Markey (D), who has been in Congress since 1976 counting his long career in the House, and former two-term Gov. Charlie Baker (R). Baker, now president of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), has repeatedly said that he will not run for the Senate.

The survey, from the University of Massachusetts (YouGov; Feb. 14-20; 700 Massachusetts adults; online), posts Sen. Markey to only a two-point edge over ex-Gov. Baker, 35-33 percent. Aside from testing a candidate who is not running, the sampling universe consists of adults and not likely or even registered voters. Therefore, the poll results, which also appear to under-count each man’s support, are not useful.

Another questionable statewide survey, but one that does monitor candidates who are running, tests the Virginia electorate regarding their open 2025 Governor’s campaign.

The Roanoke College Institute for Policy and Opinion Research, which has been known in the past for releasing certain unusual survey results that were later proven as anomalies, fielded their study of 690 likely Virginia general election voters over the Feb. 17-20 period. The Roanoke ballot test sees former Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D) leading Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle Sears (R) by a 39-24 percent spread, which appears to underestimate not only Sears’ support, but also Spanberger’s.

Furthermore, their ballot test results are inconsistent with the other five Virginia Governor polls conducted and publicized since the 2024 election. The latter surveys, from five different pollsters, cast Spanberger and Sears in a dead heat (co/efficient survey research firm), Spanberger plus-1 (Emerson College), plus-3 (Mason-Dixon Polling & Strategy), plus-5 (Christopher Newport University), and Spanberger plus-10 (Virginia Commonwealth University).

While these polls still provide some useful information, those currently testing political campaigns produce results so early in the election cycle that typically fail to properly capture the studied candidates’ accurate standing in reference to a future final result. This is because polls can only test one point in time.

Therefore, once we see campaigns beginning to spend voter contact money to deliver their message and project a theme, the ballot test results can be more seriously considered and analyzed.