Tag Archives: Nebraska

Democrats Expanding the Map

By Jim Ellis — Friday, October 9, 2026

Senate

For Democrats to claim a Senate majority, they must first protect all four of their vulnerable seats and then convert four Republican states. Because most of the competitive states lean strongly Republican, party leaders have focused on creating as many competitive contests as possible.

This cycle, they have persuaded their Senate nominees in Idaho, Nebraska, and South Dakota to withdraw, allowing Democrats to consolidate support behind Independent candidates who, in each case, are former Democrats.

They attempted the same maneuver in Montana, urging Democratic nominee Alani Bankhead to step aside in favor of Independent Seth Bodnar, the former University of Montana president, but she refused. Ironically, Montana is the state where the strategy might have been most effective because the Independent candidate here has the strongest background and campaign ability.

While Nebraska Independent Dan Osborn is again giving Sen. Pete Ricketts (R) a competitive race, just as he did two years ago against Sen. Deb Fischer (R), he and the other two Independents remain underdogs. Democrats had little to lose by attempting to elevate Independents in these deeply Republican states, but the gambit is likely to fall short.

This week, party leaders announced seven‑figure media buys in two additional Republican states, Mississippi and South Carolina, further expanding the Senate playing field.

Mississippi remains a reliably Republican state, but Democrats are now committing significant resources to promote their nominee, Lowndes County District Attorney Scott Colom. According to The Down Ballot political blog, national Democrats plan to spend more than $2 million in the final weeks of the campaign in a long‑shot effort to upset Sen. Cindy Hyde‑Smith (R), who is seeking a second full term.

Sen. Hyde‑Smith was originally appointed to succeed Sen. Thad Cochran (R) following his resignation for health reasons, then won the special election to complete his term, and secured a full six-year stint in 2020.

The most recent public Mississippi Senate poll, released by Data for Progress in August (Aug. 5-15; 1,018 likely voters), found Sen. Hyde‑Smith leading Colom and Independent attorney Ty Pinkins by a 44-38-7 percent margin. The Democratic leaders’ decision not to invest earlier suggests they viewed these August numbers as inconsistent with their internal data. Now, however, they will test whether a major media buy can shift the race; if it does, Mississippi will likely move higher on their target list.

South Carolina is another Republican state where Democrats have already been spending and will continue to do so. Since the August special Republican primary and runoff that nominated appointed Sen. Darline Graham to succeed her late brother, Lindsey Graham, Democrat Annie Andrews has dominated the airwaves while Sen. Graham has yet to mount a countering response.

Major Republican spending is expected soon to bolster Graham’s campaign and attempt to secure the race before early voting concludes. With state Attorney General Alan Wilson, son of Rep. Joe Wilson (R-Springdale), poised for a landslide victory in the open Governor’s race, Republican turnout momentum will almost assuredly benefit Sen. Graham as well.

Even so, current polling shows a tight contest. A recent Insider Advantage survey (Sept. 28-29; 1,200 likely voters) places Graham ahead just 46-45 percent, making the race tempting for Democrats to continue funding. The fundamentals still favor Sen. Graham, but the close polling ensures Democrats will remain financially and strategically engaged.

If any one of these long‑shot contests produces a Democratic upset, the investment would be well worth the cost and could well be decisive in propelling them into the Senate majority.

Governors’ Races: 2027 Redistricting

Click on map to go to Dave’sRedistrictingApp. Use the dropdown on the left labeled US Map View to navigate to the Redistricting Control Map.

By Jim Ellis — Wednesday, October 7, 2026

The Governors’ races are plentiful in 2026, with 36 statewide chief executive contests heading toward conclusion. How the most competitive races will shape the post‑Callais v. Louisiana redistricting cycle next year is a key question the new Governors will partially answer. The 2026 map is unusually symmetrical: of the 36 races, 18 are in Democratic‑held states, 18 in Republican states, and exactly half are open‑seat contests.

With Democrats primed to take the House majority in the new Congress, redistricting will again be a major factor in the 2028 election cycle. The landmark Supreme Court decision last April on the Callais case effectively eliminates the need to create protected majority minority districts, giving states the opportunity to bring their congressional and state legislative maps into compliance with the new redistricting criteria.

Republican‑led states will have incentive to adjust their maps to limit Democratic gains to a single cycle, while Democratic‑led states will seek to make their newly elected members more secure heading into 2028.

Of the 36 gubernatorial races, 15 appear competitive or moderately competitive. In those states, the 2026 outcomes could materially influence the 2027 redistricting picture. Redistricting will not occur in two of the competitive gubernatorial states, Alaska and Vermont, because both have at-large congressional districts.

Arizona

Gov. Katie Hobbs (D) is in a competitive race but continues to hold polling leads over Rep. Andy Biggs (R‑Gilbert), thus positioning her as the favorite for re‑election based on current data. Republicans maintain narrow majorities in both legislative chambers, but if Democrats were to gain control in November, movement on redistricting could follow.

Arizona was one of the first states to adopt an independent citizens’ redistricting commission, yet the 2026 cycle has shown that several states have found ways to maneuver around their commissions in order to implement new maps.

Florida

Polling shows a close Governor’s race in early October, but pollsters have badly missed the Florida elections for the past four cycles. Republicans have big majorities in both legislative chambers, so it is unlikely that the state will be a factor in 2027 redistricting irrespective of the gubernatorial outcome.

Georgia

Georgia was among the states that initially considered redrawing its maps after the Callais decision, but legislative leaders ultimately chose not to proceed. They later announced plans to call a post‑election special session, yet no such scheduling action has been taken.

If Democrat Keisha Lance Bottoms were to win the Governor’s race, legislative leaders would likely move quickly to convene and advance a map designed to add two Republican seats while Gov. Brian Kemp (R) remains in office.

Iowa

Democrat Rob Sand is well positioned to win the governorship, but it remains unlikely that redistricting will occur in a state that has effectively ceded the map‑drawing process to a legislative algorithm. Republican majorities in both legislative chambers are strong, so even with a Sand victory, it is improbable that we will see a redistricting effort regardless of how the competitive congressional elections unfold.

Kansas

Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly is term‑limited this year, giving Republicans a strong opportunity to reclaim the governorship. In most polling, state Senate President Ty Masterson (R‑El Dorado) holds an advantage over state Sen. Cindy Holscher (D‑Olathe). With Republicans maintaining solid majorities in both legislative chambers, a Masterson victory would likely place redistricting on the table for 2027. The result could be a one‑seat Republican gain.

Michigan

Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson (D) is poised to succeed term‑limited Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D), placing the focus squarely on the legislature. Democrats hold a narrow majority in the state Senate, while Republicans control the House. If the latter chamber flips, Democrats could attempt a redistricting move.

Michigan has an independent redistricting commission, but as noted earlier, several states have successfully maneuvered around their citizens’ panels in 2026. Should Democrats capture the state House majority, Michigan will become a state to watch in the redistricting arena.

Nebraska

Gov. Jim Pillen (R) faces competition in this cycle but is still expected to prevail. Republicans were just one vote short of advancing a redistricting plan in 2026, so any changes in the unicameral legislature could determine whether a new map is implemented. With the open 2nd District likely to elect a Democrat next month, Republicans would have added partisan incentive to pursue a redraw in 2027.

Nevada

Gov. Joe Lombardo (R) is in a tight re‑election campaign, and if Democratic Attorney General Aaron Ford were to unseat him, redistricting could quickly emerge as an issue in the new legislative session. Democrats appear positioned to retain their majorities in both legislative chambers.

Should they also capture the state’s lone Republican congressional district, the Reno‑anchored 2nd District, a Democratic legislature and Governor would likely move to redraw the map in order to make that seat more secure for their new Representative. Whether redistricting occurs in 2027 will largely hinge on the gubernatorial outcome.

New York

The Empire State will be particularly interesting to watch next year on the redistricting front. Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) is favored to win re‑election, and the legislature will remain solidly Democratic. Although New York has a redistricting commission, Democrats believe they can draw additional Democratic‑leaning districts.

Their challenge, however, is the state’s significant population loss concentrated entirely in New York City. According to mid‑decade Census Bureau estimates, New York has lost more than 200,000 residents, all from NYC, while the rest of the state has experienced modest growth. As a result, efforts to increase Democratic seats when the party’s anchor population base is likely to lose representation in the next apportionment may prove more difficult than a cursory overview suggests.

Ohio

The Buckeye State conducts redistricting through a bipartisan commission composed of seven elected officials. Because the panel adopted a new map with unanimous support earlier this year, that plan can remain in place for the rest of the decade. As a result, it is unlikely the Commission will reopen the contentious process in 2027.

Oregon

Democratic Gov. Tina Kotek is unexpectedly locked in a very tight re‑election race, but redistricting is unlikely to occur regardless of the outcome. The Democratic majority has already maximized its advantage under the current congressional map, leaving little room for improvement. As a result, a 2027 redistricting effort does not appear likely.

Texas

Gov. Greg Abbott (R) is likely to win a fourth term, though by a closer‑than‑expected margin. Republicans will retain control of the state Senate, but their House majority may narrow. Because the congressional map was redrawn this year, it is unlikely that redistricting will make a return appearance in 2027.

Wisconsin

In Wisconsin, the gubernatorial and legislative elections will directly determine whether redistricting occurs. The state Supreme Court declined to act on a case that could have triggered a redraw this year, so a Democratic sweep in November is the most plausible path for redistricting to move to the forefront in 2027.

The Governor’s race between Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley (D) and Rep. Tom Tiffany (R‑Minocqua) remains tight, and Republicans currently hold tentative majorities in both legislative chambers. Should Democrats gain control and pursue a redraw, they could potentially add two congressional seats.

Senate Race Clues – Part II

By Jim Ellis — Tuesday, September 29, 2026

Today, we conclude our status report on the competitive US Senate races. The seven remaining states, listed in alphabetical order, begin with Montana and end with Texas.

Montana

This is one of the states where Democratic leaders attempted to persuade their Senate nominee to withdraw so the party could consolidate behind a stronger Independent candidate. The strategy succeeded in Idaho, Nebraska, and South Dakota, but the Montana nominee declined to step aside. Ironically, Montana may be the state where the ploy might have worked.

The Independent candidate, former University of Montana president Seth Bodnar, is significantly stronger than the Democratic nominee, Alani Bankhead. Because Bankhead refused to withdraw, Republican Kurt Alme is positioned to win — but likely with only plurality support. Alme, a former US Attorney, was handpicked by retiring Sen. Steve Daines (R) as the filing period closed.

The latest poll again reflects the same pattern seen throughout the cycle: Alme 45 percent, Bodnar 26 percent, and Bankhead 19 percent (American Pulse Research & Polling for KULR‑TV Billings; Sept. 19-24; 604 likely voters).

Nebraska

Here, we again see the Democratic nominee withdrawing to give Independent Dan Osborn a clear shot at the Senate seat, this time against Sen. Pete Ricketts (R). Polling once more shows the race as a dead heat.

In late September and early October of 2024, when Osborn challenged Sen. Deb Fischer (R), five polls were conducted between Sept. 23 and Oct. 8. Osborn led in all five by an average of 3.4 percentage points. In the end, Sen. Fischer won by just under seven points. Given that history, we are likely to see a similar conclusion in this race.

New Hampshire

The New Hampshire campaign is evolving into an interesting race that will likely end in a close finish on Nov. 3. With Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D) retiring, Rep. Chris Pappas (D-Manchester) is the new Democratic nominee. The Republican candidate is former Senator and ex-Congressman John E. Sununu.

The Sununu name has long been a fixture in New Hampshire politics, beginning with the nominee’s father, who won three gubernatorial elections, and continuing with his brother, Chris Sununu, who won four consecutive terms as Governor.

Though Republican Gov. Kelly Ayotte is running strongly at the top of the ticket, polling still continues to show Rep. Pappas with a consistent lead in the Senate race. The most recent public survey — Trafalgar Group (Sept. 26–27; 1,082 likely voters; mixed sampling) — finds Pappas running ahead 47-41 percent.

An economic factor working in Pappas’ favor is the recent surge in home heating‑oil prices. The sharp increases are politically damaging for Sununu, particularly because President Trump — who has never carried New Hampshire — is widely blamed for the high costs. In a state heavily dependent on heating oil, this issue could prove decisive.

North Carolina

Sen. Thom Tillis (R) is retiring, and this is clearly the most likely Republican Senate seat to flip to the Democrats. The Democratic nominee, two-term Governor and ex-Attorney General Roy Cooper — who won twice as Governor and four times as Attorney General — is a runaway favorite over former Republican National Committee chairman Michael Whatley, a first‑time candidate. Since the March 3 primary, 28 polls have been released in this race, and Cooper has led in all 28.

Even Fabrizio Lee & Associates, the polling firm that conducts work for President Trump, and the Democratic firm Impact Research jointly find Cooper ahead 53-42 percent (Sept. 17-20; 1,806 likely voters; online). At this point, it is difficult to see a scenario in which the race turns in Whatley’s favor.

Ohio

The Buckeye State campaign is another where we could see a replay of recent history. Two years ago, then‑Sen. Sherrod Brown (D) led in polling but ultimately lost to newcomer Bernie Moreno (R) by 3.6 percentage points.

This time, former Sen. Brown faces appointed Sen. Jon Husted (R), whom Gov. Mike DeWine (R) tapped to fill J.D. Vance’s seat when he became Vice President. Before winning two terms as lieutenant governor on DeWine’s ticket, Husted captured two statewide victories as Ohio’s Secretary of State.

While it appears today that Brown has a legitimate chance to return to the Senate, it is important to remember that he received 292,441 more votes in 2024 than when he last won in 2018 — and still lost by more than three points. This illustrates how far Ohio has moved rightward during that particular time interval.

Recent reports also indicate that although Brown has raised substantial money and has $60 million reserved in advertising before Election Day, Husted has $90 million, and a cryptocurrency‑backed outside group has announced an additional $30 million in spending to attack Brown. The final weeks of this race promise to be hard‑fought.

South Carolina

The unexpected death of Sen. Lindsey Graham (R) led to the appointment — and eventual in‑cycle nomination — of his sister, Darline Graham (R), as his replacement.

After fighting through a special primary and a tough runoff against Rep. Ralph Norman (R-Rock Hill), Sen. Graham now faces pediatrician Annie Andrews (D), who has dominated the airwaves since the GOP runoff in late August. The Graham campaign and outside Republican groups are preparing to counter with their own media blitz, a shift that will likely turn what appears to be a close contest into one that yields a relatively comfortable Republican win.

Because Darline Graham is largely an untested candidate, the final margin may be closer than what we are accustomed to seeing in the Palmetto State. Still, she is well‑positioned to secure a six‑year term.

Texas

The Lone Star State Senate race is drawing significant political attention, pitting scandal‑tainted Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) – who denied Sen. John Cornyn (R) renomination – against state Rep. James Talarico (D-Austin), a candidate positioned well to the ideological left in one of the nation’s most reliably Republican states.

Democrats have not won a statewide race here since 1994, and Talarico still faces a difficult challenge even though a plethora of polling consistently shows him holding small leads.

It is important to remember, however, that 2024 polling projected President Trump ahead by roughly six points, yet he won Texas by 13. In the same election, Sen. Ted Cruz (R) was, on average, ahead by about two points in pre‑election polling but ultimately won by eight. Republicans consistently under‑poll in Texas, and the Senate Leadership Fund is now coming to Paxton’s aid with a $100 million spending commitment. Given these dynamics, this race remains very much in play.

Senate: 10 Toss-Up States

By Jim Ellis — Friday, September 18, 2026

With new polling arriving almost daily, an unusually large number of Senate races are now entering the toss‑up realm. Early and mid‑September surveys indicate that 10 Senate campaigns currently fall within a three‑point margin, placing them squarely inside the traditional polling margin of error and classifying each as too close to call.

Three of these 10 toss‑ups are in states that typically vote Democratic at the federal level. This dynamic significantly complicates the Democrats’ path to erasing the Republicans’ net four‑seat advantage. Because Republicans would retain the majority in a 50-50 Senate, Democrats must reach 51 seats to claim control.

Under that math, Democrats would need to win nine of the 10 toss‑up races, assuming former Gov. Roy Cooper (D) converts the open North Carolina seat. If Cooper does not win NC, Democrats would need to sweep all 10 toss‑ups to reach a majority.

Below are the toss‑up states, listed alphabetically, along with the September polls that place each race within the three‑point margin of error.

Alaska

Sen. Dan Sullivan (R) performed poorly in Alaska’s Aug. 18 jungle primary, finishing 8.1 percentage points behind former at‑large Rep. Mary Peltola (D). Since then, however, he has rebounded.

The co/efficient September survey (Sept. 14-17; 799 likely Alaska voters) now finds Sen. Sullivan ahead 48-46 percent. A Rasmussen Reports poll conducted one day earlier (Sept. 13-14; 1,188 likely voters) showed the race tied at 39 percent apiece.

Iowa

In the most recent Iowa survey, another from the busy co/efficient firm (Sept. 14-16; 831 likely Iowa voters), Rep. Ashley Hinson (R‑Marion/Cedar Rapids) leads state Rep. Josh Turek (D‑Council Bluffs) 46-42 percent. Rasmussen Reports, however, produced a very different result in its Sept. 8-10 statewide poll (1,031 likely voters), finding Rep. Turek ahead 45-40 percent.

Though neither poll falls within the three‑point toss‑up range, the fact that two reputable pollsters show opposite leaders strongly suggests that the true state of the race is closer than either individual survey indicates.

Maine

Sen. Susan Collins (R) has trailed for much of the race since Democrats forced nominee Graham Platner out and transferred the Senate party nomination to former state Senate President Troy Jackson. The latest polling shows a contest that has tightened considerably.

Quantus Insights (Sept. 14-15; 621 likely voters) reported Sen. Collins claiming a one‑point edge, 48-47 percent. Just days earlier, Rasmussen Reports (Sept. 8-10; 1,033 likely Maine voters) found Jackson leading 46-45 percent.

Michigan

Though Democrat Abdul El‑Sayed has held a slight lead in several post‑primary polls, he has yet to consistently break 48 percent in political polling. Former Congressman Mike Rogers (R) remains consistently within the polling margin of error.

Emerson College (Sept. 12-14; 1,000 likely Michigan voters) shows El‑Sayed ahead 48-46 percent. A Washington Post survey conducted just days earlier (Sept. 10-14; 803 likely voters) found a similar 48-45 percent advantage. Conversely, earlier September data from the Glengariff Group (Aug. 31-Sept. 3; 600 likely voters) placed Rogers in front, 46-44 percent, underscoring how tightly contested the race remains.

Minnesota

Republican Michele Tafoya has steadily closed the gap in this race, gaining enough momentum to force Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan (D) into a virtual tie. The latest co/efficient survey (Sept. 14-15; 833 likely Minnesota voters) shows Flanagan holding a narrow 43-42 percent edge. A SurveyUSA poll conducted just days earlier (Sept. 9-14; 654 likely voters) projects an outright 44-44 percent dead heat.

Nebraska

Wedgewood Polls (Sept. 14-16; 500 likely Nebraska voters) shows Sen. Pete Ricketts (R) holding a four‑point lead, 52-48 percent, with leaners allocated to both candidates. SurveyUSA on the other hand (Sept. 8-13; 503 likely voters), finds Independent Dan Osborn posting a similar four‑point advantage, 46-42 percent.

As in Iowa, neither margin falls within the three‑point toss‑up range. Yet the fact that two pollsters, in consecutive periods, each project four‑point leads for opposite candidates strongly suggests the race is considerably closer than either individual survey indicates.

New Hampshire

This contest has shown steady Republican momentum since the state’s late Sept. 8 primary. co/efficient surveyed New Hampshire immediately after the nomination vote (Sept. 9-11; 958 likely voters) and found Rep. Chris Pappas (D-Manchester) and former Sen. John E. Sununu (R) tied at 46 percent. Prior to the primary, two late‑August polls also pointed to a competitive race and showed Sununu clinging to a narrow advantage.

Republican polling firm Fabrizio Lee & Associates (Aug. 27-30; 600 likely voters) posted Sununu to a slight 37-36 percent lead, while the University of New Hampshire (Aug. 20-24; 1,878 likely voters) found a 45-43 percent Sununu edge.

Ohio

Two pollsters, the Trafalgar Group and Bowling Green State University/YouGov, surveyed the Ohio electorate between Sept. 14-16 and Sept.1-10, respectively. Former Sen. Sherrod Brown (D), attempting a comeback after losing his 2024 race, held three‑point leads over appointed Sen. Jon Husted (R) in both surveys, 45-42 percent and 48-45 percent.

This pattern mirrors what occurred in the 2024 Senate election. Sen. Brown posted similar small leads in September of that year, only to see his advantage fade as the campaign moved closer to Election Day. He ultimately lost in 2024 to Republican Bernie Moreno by 3.5 percentage points.

South Dakota

Public Policy Polling released its latest South Dakota survey (Sept. 8-9; 629 registered voters), suggesting that the Democrats’ strategy of persuading their nominee to withdraw so the party could formally back Independent Brian Bengs is beginning to bear fruit. The PPP ballot test shows Sen. Mike Rounds (R) leading Bengs only 45-42 percent. This marks the second poll within a month indicating that the race could be competitive.

Texas

Five polls have been released in the Texas Senate race just since Sept. 8. While two of the five give state Rep. James Talarico (D-Austin) more than a three‑point lead over Attorney General Ken Paxton (R), three surveys, from Emerson College, Insider Advantage, and Mason‑Dixon Polling & Strategy, find the contest within the three‑point toss‑up sphere.

Emerson College (Sept. 12-14; 1,000 likely Texas voters) and Insider Advantage (Sept. 8–9; 1,200 likely voters) each recorded the same 47-46 percent Talarico edge. Mason‑Dixon Polling & Strategy (Sept. 8-10; 625 likely voters) measured a 46-43 percent Talarico lead.

The culmination of these 10 toss‑up races will likely determine which party controls the Senate in the next Congress, and each will be closely monitored all the way through Election Day.

Nebraska’s Notable Numbers

By Jim Ellis — Tuesday, September 15, 2026

Senate

SurveyUSA went into the field to test the Cornhusker State of Nebraska’s electorate and it appears we may be seeing deja vu all over again in the state’s US Senate race.

In 2024, Independent Dan Osborn came from nowhere to give Republican Sen. Deb Fischer a tough race when it appeared that she would run virtually unopposed. As September closed that year, Osborn was running consistently ahead in multiple polls, yet ultimately lost by almost seven percentage points – despite late polling suggesting Sen. Fischer’s average advantage was under two points.

This year, Republican Sen. Pete Ricketts, who won the 2024 special election with 63 percent of the vote to serve the balance of the current term and now seeks a full six‑year stint, faces Osborn as the latter man returns to try again. Approaching mid‑September, a familiar pattern is emerging: a new poll again shows Osborn with a slight lead.

The SurveyUSA data (Sept. 8-13; 503 likely Nebraska general‑election voters; live interview and text) places Osborn ahead of Ricketts, 46-42 percent. The only other publicly released poll since the May 12th primary, conducted by Democratic firm Impact Research (Aug. 9-13; 600 likely voters; live interview), found the race deadlocked at 47 percent apiece.

SurveyUSA segmented its current results by congressional district. While the cell sizes are too small to draw firm conclusions, they offer directional insight.

As expected, Sen. Ricketts performed strongly in the heavily Republican 3rd District and trailed in the Omaha based 2nd CD. Raising eyebrows, however, was his deficit in the Republican leaning 1st District that Congressman Mike Flood (R-Norfolk/ Lincoln) represents. With only 176 respondents in that segment, the finding is not definitive, but the ballot test deficit is enough to command the attention of Sen. Ricketts’ political strategists.

Another unexpected finding came from the favorability ratings. Statewide responses for President Trump, GOP Gov. Jim Pillen, Democratic gubernatorial nominee Lynne Walz, Sen. Ricketts, and Osborn all registered negative images. Seeing all statewide figures viewed negatively may reflect the broader political frustration appearing across much of the country.

Supporting the frustration interpretation, a YouGov national online survey for CBS News (Sept. 8-11; 1,809 registered voters) found nearly identical unfavorable ratings for both major parties: Republicans were negatively viewed by a 43:56 ratio and Democrats at a 44:56 negative proportion.

Yet even with Gov. Pillen’s poor 35:52 favorability score, he still leads Walz – a former state Senator and cousin of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz – by a 43-35 percent margin in the SUSA ballot test. Such conflicting and sometimes counterintuitive resultshave seemingly become commonplace throughout much of the country.

As Republicans appear to be facing a difficult national environment – potentially losing the House majority and seeing their Senate advantage threatened – the question becomes whether voters will turn to a Democratic Party they view with comparable dissatisfaction.

The closing weeks of the 2026 campaign may therefore produce unexpected messaging choices and unconventional strategic decisions as candidates and party leaders navigate through what increasingly looks like a demoralized electorate.

The Democrats’ Independent Ploy

By Jim Ellis — Tuesday, September 1, 2026

Democrats and their ideological coalition partners are pursuing a coordinated strategy across the Mountain and Midwest states to make otherwise safe Republican Senate seats more competitive. Their chances of unseating GOP incumbents remain low, but recent polling indicates that races in Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, and South Dakota have tightened.

The approach follows the model established in Nebraska’s 2024 Senate race, when Independent Dan Osborn, with the help of the Nebraska Democratic Party, which agreed not to field its own candidate, turned what had appeared to be an easy re‑election path for Sen. Deb Fischer (R) into a serious contest.

Osborn returns this year, this time challenging Sen. Pete Ricketts. Democrats and their ideological allies have now replicated the Nebraska blueprint in Idaho and South Dakota, clearing the field for coalition‑aligned Independent candidates and persuading the Democratic nominees in all three states to withdraw. They attempted the same maneuver in Montana, but Democratic nominee Alani Bankhead refused to step aside.

Idaho

Sen. Jim Risch (R), who previously served a short stint as Idaho’s Governor, two non‑consecutive partial terms as Lieutenant Governor, and 22 years in the state Senate, is seeking a fourth term in the US Senate.

In late July, Democratic nominee David Roth withdrew from the race, clearing a path for Independent Todd Achilles, a former Democratic state legislator, to mount a stronger challenge. The contest is not a direct one‑on‑one matchup, however, as two additional Independent candidates also appear on the ballot.

Highly conflicting August polls emerged within days of each other. Peak Insights (Aug. 11-13; 500 likely Idaho voters) showed Sen. Risch with a commanding 52-18 percent lead over Achilles. By contrast, the Bullfinch Group (Aug. 16-19; 608 likely Idaho voters) reported a dramatically different result, placing Achilles ahead 38-32 percent.

Across its three surveys of the race, the Bullfinch Group has consistently produced much tighter margins than other pollsters. For example, Change Research – a Democratic firm – found Risch in a far stronger position in its late July poll (July 28-30; 1,213 likely Idaho general election voters; online), showing the Senator leading Achilles 45-21 percent.

Sen. Risch remains favored for re‑election, but Mr. Achilles, running without the Democratic Party label, presents a more formidable challenge than a traditional party nominee would in heavily Republican Idaho.

Montana

Democratic Party leaders urged their June 2 primary winner, retired Air Force officer Alani Bankhead, to withdraw from the Montana Senate race in order to give former University of Montana President Seth Bodnar a stronger chance of preventing Republican Kurt Alme from succeeding retiring Sen. Steve Daines (R). Bankhead refused and remains a candidate. Her presence on the ballot creates a four‑way contest that clearly benefits Alme.

Controversy erupted at the candidate filing deadline when Sen. Daines – who had already filed for re‑election – abruptly withdrew as the window was closing, allowing Alme to file with almost no time left for other Republicans to enter the race. In a hypothetical two‑way contest between Alme and Bodnar, the latter polled competitively and made the general election a genuine race.

In the multi‑candidate configuration, Alme leads by a substantial margin but falls short of majority support. Montana recognizes plurality victories, however, so the current ballot structure favors the GOP nominee.

The latest Hart Research poll underscores how Bankhead’s decision to stay in the race reshapes the contest. According to their survey (Aug. 1-4; 800 likely Montana general election voters), Alme leads the four‑way race with 46 percent, Bodnar follows at 30 percent and Bankhead at 15 percent. In a hypothetical head‑to‑head matchup, Hart Research finds Alme and Bodnar tied at 46 percent each.

The FiftyPlusOne polling aggregator similarly shows Alme with an average 45-26-22 percent advantage over Bodnar and Bankhead, respectively.

Nebraska

Independent Dan Osborn returns with official Democratic Party and liberal organization backing after major‑party nominee Cindy Burbank – who initially insisted she would remain in the race even when the Secretary of State questioned her intentions – ultimately withdrew, giving Osborn a clear path. Last month, the Legalize Marijuana Party candidate also exited the contest, leaving Osborn in a direct one‑on‑one matchup with Sen. Pete Ricketts (R).

As in 2024, polling now suggests the Nebraska Senate race is highly competitive. Still, based on historical voting patterns, the eventual outcome as Election Day approaches is likely to favor Sen. Ricketts by more than five percentage points.

Across his three statewide elections – two for Governor and one for the Senate in 2024, when he won the special election to fill the remainder of former Sen. Ben Sasse’s term – Sen. Ricketts has averaged 59 percent of the vote.

South Dakota

The most recent Senate race in which an Independent has become the principal challenger to a Republican incumbent lies in South Dakota, where Democratic nominee Julian Beaudion withdrew in early August. His departure leaves Independent Brian Bengs, a former Democrat, as Sen. Mike Rounds’ (R) chief opponent.

A new survey suggests the race could become competitive, though polls taken immediately after a major candidate withdrawal often give the remaining challenger a temporary boost. The Democratic polling firm Impact Research conducted a live‑interview poll (Aug. 13–17; 500 likely South Dakota general election voters) showing Bengs pulling into a 44-44 percent tie with Sen. Rounds.

It is unlikely that such parity will hold as Election Day approaches, but the result ensures that the South Dakota Senate race will receive more attention than originally expected.

Nebraska & WV Primary Results

By Jim Ellis — Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Nebraska

The big story emerging from the Nebraska primary is whether Cindy Burbank, who last night overwhelmingly won the Democratic primary with 90 percent of the vote over Pastor Bill Forbes, will now withdraw from the race, thereby giving Independent Dan Osborn a clear path to challenge Sen. Pete Ricketts (R) in the general election.

Controversy arose over pre-primary comments she made about endorsing Osborn if she were to become the Democratic nominee before exiting the race. Those remarks prompted the Secretary of State to disqualify her candidacy, arguing that she had violated Nebraska’s candidate oath, which requires individuals seeking office to pledge that they will serve if nominated and elected.

Burbank sued to retain her place on the ballot and prevailed in court. At the time of her reinstatement, she again pledged to remain in the race and serve if elected. Whether she ultimately keeps that promise remains to be seen.

It is clear that Burbank, who raised less than $5,000 for her statewide primary campaign, is unlikely to mount a significant challenge against Sen. Ricketts. Osborn, by contrast, has already raised more than $4 million for his campaign and is clearly emerging as Sen. Ricketts’ principal opponent.

In the House races, the 2nd District Democratic primary is ending in a close contest between political consultant Denise Powell and state Sen. John Cavanaugh (D-Omaha). It appears Powell will upset Sen. Cavanaugh who was considered the favorite for the nomination.

With about 6,300 votes remaining to be counted, Powell led 38.9 – 36.8 percent. The eventual winner, presumably Powell, will advance to the general election to face Omaha City Councilman Brinker Harding, who was unopposed in the Republican primary.

The 2nd District represents a prime Democratic conversion opportunity from an electorate that twice opposed President Trump and where Republican incumbent Don Bacon is retiring after what will be 10 years of service in the US House.

In the 1st Congressional District, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Chris Backemeyer won the Democratic primary and will now challenge incumbent Rep. Mike Flood (R-Norfolk) in the general election.

In the 3rd CD, which stretches across the width of the state from the Wyoming and Colorado borders to Iowa and Missouri, veteran Rep. Adrian Smith (R-Gering) will face agribusiness associate Becky Stille in the general election. Nebraska’s 3rd District is one of the safest Republican seats in the country. Rep. Mike Flood is also considered a prohibitive favorite for re-election.

In the Governor’s race, incumbent Jim Pillen won renomination in the Republican primary with more than 75 percent of the vote. His general election opponent will be former state Sen. Lynne Walz (D), a cousin of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the former Democratic Vice Presidential nominee.

West Virginia

Sen. Shelley Moore Capito won an easy Republican primary victory last night in the Mountain State, scoring a 66 percent win over state Sen. Tom Willis (R-Berkeley) and four minor intra-party opponents.

In the general election, she will face former Morgantown City Councilwoman Rachel Fetty-Anderson who secured a 33-27 percent victory over former state Senate President Jeff Kessler and three lesser-known Democratic candidates. Sen. Capito now becomes a prohibitive favorite in the general election.

In the congressional races, 1st District Rep. Carol Miller (R-Huntington) will square off against retired public policy analyst Vince George, who won the Democratic primary.

In northern District 2, the new Democratic nominee is political organizer Ace Parsi, who scored a close 40-38 percent victory over educator Stephanie Spears Tomana. Parsi will now face freshman Rep. Riley Moore (R-Harpers Ferry), who was unopposed for renomination.

Along with Sen. Capito, both Reps. Miller and Moore are strong favorites in the general election.

Nebraska & WV Primaries Today

By Jim Ellis — Tuesday, May 12, 2026

Two more states are holding their regular primary elections today: the Cornhusker State of Nebraska and the Mountain State of West Virginia. We have entered a primary election cycle where various states hold primaries every week from now through June 30. In May, primaries will be held today, the 12th, and on the 16th, 19th and 26th. In June, 17 more primaries will be held on every Tuesday of the month — on the 2nd, 9th, 18th, 23rd, and 30th.

Nebraska

Several Nebraska races are of note today, but none more unique than the US Senate Democratic primary.

As we saw in 2024, Independent Dan Osborn emerged as the de facto Democratic challenger to Sen. Deb Fischer (R) with the party’s official support. This year, he returns to challenge Sen. Pete Ricketts (R), who is on the ballot seeking his first full six-year term.

Ricketts, the state’s former Governor, was appointed in 2023 to replace resigned Sen. Ben Sasse (R). He was then elected in 2024 with 62 percent of the vote to serve the remaining two years of the current term.

The Democratic primary is the race to watch tonight. Two candidates are on the ballot, and the eventual nominee could ultimately withdraw from the race.

Democratic activist Cindy Burbank previously stated that she supports Dan Osborn and would withdraw from the race and endorse him if she became the Democratic nominee. The Secretary of State subsequently disqualified her candidacy, citing a Nebraska law requiring candidates to sign an oath affirming that they will assume office if elected. Burbank challenged the decision in court, and a judge later reinstated her candidacy.

The other Democratic candidate is pastor Bill Forbes, who says he supports Sen. Ricketts. So, it is likely that he would remain on the ballot should he win the party nomination in order to draw some Democratic votes away from Mr. Osborn.

Neither Democratic primary candidate has raised significant funds. According to the March 31 Federal Election Commission financial disclosure reports, Burbank had raised just $4,296 for her campaign, while Pastor Forbes reported only $1,000.

All of this points toward a general election featuring Sen. Pete Ricketts and Independent Dan Osborn. The race is expected to become expensive, but the Senator remains the clear favorite to win comfortably, regardless of what early polling may suggest.

Gov. Jim Pillen is seeking a second term and faces only minor opposition in the Republican primary. Democrats, meanwhile, are holding a two-way primary, with former state Sen. Lynne Walz, a cousin of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D), expected to win the party’s nomination tonight. Gov. Pillen is favored for re-election.

Two of the state’s three congressional incumbents are seeking re-election. Rep. Mike Flood (R-Norfolk) is unopposed for renomination and will likely face former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Chris Backemeyer, who is expected to emerge from tonight’s Democratic primary. With a partisan lean of 56.7R – 40.4D, according to Dave’s Redistricting App, Rep. Flood should face little difficulty in the general election.

Third District veteran Rep. Adrian Smith (R-Gering) sees only minor opposition in tonight’s Republican primary. He represents Nebraska’s safest Republican congressional district, with a partisan lean of 75.2 – 22.8D according to Dave’s Redistricting App. NE-3 is a sprawling district that stretches across the state from the Wyoming and Colorado borders to the Iowa and Missouri lines.

The state’s key general election battle will take place in the Omaha anchored 2nd Congressional District, where five-term Rep. Don Bacon (R-Papillion) is retiring. The district’s electorate has twice voted against President Trump, supporting Kamala Harris 52-47 percent in 2024 and Joe Biden with a 52-46 percent margin in 2020.

The 2nd District is considered one of Democrats’ top conversion opportunities in the country. Republicans will formally nominate Omaha City Councilman Brinker Harding tonight, as he runs unopposed for the party’s nomination.

The Democratic field is crowded, with six candidates competing for the nomination. The contest is largely centered on state Sen. John Cavanaugh (D-Omaha), whose father served in the US House in the 1970s, political consultant and Democratic activist Denise Powell, and former US Department of Veterans Affairs Deputy Assistant Secretary Kishla Askins.

West Virginia

A quiet primary night is expected in the Mountain State. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R) is seeking a third term and, although she faces five Republican challengers, the most notable being state Sen. Tom Willis (R-Berkeley), she is widely expected to secure renomination with ease. Sen. Capito is also a prohibitive favorite in the general election.

In the House, Rep. Carol Miller (R-Huntington) faces only a minor opponent in tonight’s primary. In the 2nd District, freshman Rep. Riley Moore (R-Harpers Ferry) is unopposed for renomination. Both incumbents are considered strong favorites for re-election in November.

Competitive Senate Finance – Part II

By Jim Ellis — Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2025

Senate

Continuing from yesterday’s update, the Federal Election Commission has released new Senate campaign finance numbers, which help us preview the resource standing of the key 2026 US Senate contests. Today’s installment covers the most competitive contests from Massachusetts through Texas.

Massachusetts

Just in the past week we see a Democratic primary emerging between Bay State Sen. Ed Markey and Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Salem). Both men have equivalent cash reserves ($2.7M for Markey; Moulton: $2.1M) but it is clear that Sen. Markey begins as the favorite.

Rep. Moulton will try to make the incumbent’s age (Markey will be 80 years old at the time of the next election) an issue, but it is unlikely that such an attack will dissuade a majority of Democrats from voting for the veteran politician who first came to Congress in 1976.

This primary challenge is a very long shot but the Massachusetts primary cycle is lengthy, and much can change. The nomination election is not scheduled until Sept. 1, 2026.

Michigan

The open Michigan Senate race will be one of the top national contests next year. Republicans have successfully given former US Representative and 2024 US Senate nominee Mike Rogers a clear path to the nomination which helps solve one of their key past problem areas: fundraising. The fact that Rogers does not have to spend much to secure the nomination means virtually all fundraising assets will be directly applied to the general election. At this point, Rogers holds $2.7 million in his campaign account.

The Democrats, on the other hand, are embroiled in a tough primary that won’t be decided until Aug. 4. The three major candidates have equivalent resources. Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Birmingham) holds $2.6 million, state Sen. Mallory McMorrow (D-Royal Oak) reports $1.4 million cash-on-hand, and former Wayne County Health Director Abdul El-Sayed has also proven himself a strong fundraiser. His campaign account reports $1.8 in available resources.

The Democratic primary is a toss-up at this point. Expect a tough campaign before a nominee is crowned and financial resources will be exhausted. Democrats are adept fundraisers, however, so the winner’s campaign treasury will be quickly replenished after the party unites post-primary.

Minnesota

The Land of 10,000 Lakes also features a competitive Democratic Senate primary. In this case, the candidates are vying to replace the retiring Sen. Tina Smith (D). Today, it appears the nomination contest is evolving into a two-way affair between Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan and Rep. Angie Craig (D-Prior Lake).

In Minnesota, the state political party endorsements are very influential. Usually, a candidate not obtaining the party endorsement withdraws from the race but is not required to do so. For this Senate primary, it is likely that both of these candidates will advance into the Aug. 11 primary irrespective of the party endorsement process.

According to third quarter (Q3) financial reports, Craig has a significant fundraising advantage. She posts $2.9 million cash-on-hand as compared to just under $836,000 for Lt. Gov. Flanagan.

Nebraska

In 2024, Independent Dan Osborn became the election cycle’s surprise Senate candidate when he took several polling leads over Nebraska Sen. Deb Fischer (R). In the end, Sen. Fischer claimed a six-point win, but Osborn’s strong fundraising effort and populist appeal turned what should have been an easy Fischer win into a competitive contest.

Now, Osborn returns for another Senate campaign, this time against Sen. Pete Ricketts (R). Once again, Osborn is likely to enjoy Democratic Party official support; therefore, the party won’t field its own candidate. Sen. Ricketts is still a strong favorite, but this contest is likely to again draw national attention.

The Q3 financial disclosure reports show Sen. Ricketts holding $1.2 million in his campaign account while Osborn posts just under $517,000.

New Hampshire

Democratic Rep. Chris Pappas (D-Manchester) has successfully defined himself as the consensus party candidate to replace retiring Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D).

Republicans are likely to soon see a new entry, possibly later this week. Former Sen. John E. Sununu, the son of former Governor and White House chief of staff John Sununu and brother of former four-term Gov. Chris Sununu, is likely to enter the campaign very soon. At this point, the leading Republican is former Massachusetts Senator and 2014 New Hampshire Senate candidate Scott Brown.

Early polling puts Sununu in position to tighten the race against Rep. Pappas, while the Congressman appears poised to easily defeat Brown. Rep. Pappas reports $2.6 million in his campaign account as compared to just under $803,000 for Brown. Since Sununu is not an official candidate, he is not yet required to file a disclosure report.

North Carolina

In what promises to be one of the defining national Senatorial contests, the general election candidates in the Tar Heel State are unofficially set: Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper and former Republican National Committee chairman Michael Whatley are virtually unopposed for their respective nominations.

Cooper has a major fundraising advantage. He already holds $8.6 million in his campaign account. Whatley, who started later, has just $1.1 million. Expect this race to go down to the wire. All North Carolina statewide races are tight, and this one will be no exception.

Ohio

The Ohio special election is another race where the general election is virtually set. Appointed Sen. Jon Husted (R) will run to serve the final two years of the current term. Opposing him will be former Sen. Sherrod Brown (D), who lost his seat in 2024.

This will be an expensive race, since then-Sen. Brown raised over $100 million for his last campaign. At this point, Brown has $5.9 million in cash-on-hand. Sen. Husted posts a similar $5 million. While Sen. Husted has the advantage because Ohio has been moving decidedly rightward in recent elections, we can count on seeing a very competitive contest here next year.

Texas

The Texas Senate situation has recently changed. With Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-Houston) joining the Senate Republican primary, the race is no longer solely a battle between Sen. John Cornyn and Attorney General Ken Paxton. The chances of the Republicans heading to a post-primary runoff are now high.

For the Democrats, former Congressman and 2024 Senate nominee Colin Allred is no longer a lock for the 2026 party nomination. Polling shows him dropping. Announced candidate James Talarico, an Austin state Representative, is making significant gains. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Dallas), while not an announced candidate, is the clear polling leader. Not only is the Republican primary in a state of flux, but now the Democratic nomination battle is as well.

On the financial front, Sen. Cornyn is the strongest among all candidates. He holds $6.0 million in his campaign account, which compares favorably against AG Paxton ($3.2M) and Rep. Hunt ($1.5M).

For the Democrats, it is Talarico who possesses the most money at $4.9 million. Rep. Crockett, again not officially in the race, has $4.8 million, and Allred finds himself trailing in this category too, with $1.8 million. In 2024, Allred was one of the top Democratic fundraisers in the country.

The Texas Senate race will be a race to watch from the March 3 primary until the campaign concludes on Election Day, Nov. 4, 2026.

Nebraska Senate:
Independent Osborn to Return

By Jim Ellis — Thursday, July 10, 2025

Senate

Nebraska US Senate candidate Dan Osborn (I)

We’re about to see a partial rerun in the upcoming Nebraska Senate race.

For a time during the 2024 election cycle, Nebraska Independent US Senate candidate Dan Osborn looked like he might pull a stunning upset. Towards the end, the momentum fundamentally shifted, and he lost to Sen. Deb Fischer (R) by a 53.2 – 46.5 percent margin. Osborn announced on Tuesday that he would return for a second try, this time against Republican Senator and former two-term Gov. Pete Ricketts.

Throughout the previous campaign cycle’s latter stage, Osborn was posting strong poll numbers and attracting viable financial support in his race against Sen. Fischer. He was also the beneficiary of significant national political attention.

Though an Independent, he was the de facto Democratic nominee since the party did not file a candidate in the Fischer race, which obviously helped transform Osborn into a major contender. Osborn claimed, however, that he did not accept the Democratic endorsement.

Additionally, even his last name helped him for a time. In the early part of the 2024 cycle, there was confusion among some thinking that Osborn was, or is related to, Hall of Fame college football coach, former Congressman, and Nebraska legend Tom Osborne. An ad from Coach Osborne for the Fischer campaign clarified the matter.

Characterizing his new campaign against Sen. Ricketts as “The Billionaire Class vs. The Working Class,” Osborn formally announced that he would return to again campaign for the Senate in 2026.

In his ’24 race, the Osborn campaign reported total financial receipts of $15.13 million, largely from Democratic sources outside of the state. The Ricketts campaign was quick to jump on Osborn through spokesman Will Coup saying, “Dan Osborn is bought and paid for by his liberal, out-of-state, coastal donors. Dan Osborn will side with Chuck Schumer over Nebraska families and vote with Democrats to open the border, hike taxes, and stop the America First agenda.”

Osborn retorted saying, “I didn’t ask for that money. This time around, I’m not going to ask for it again. The Democrats are going to do what the Democrats do, and Republicans are going to do what the Republicans are going to do. And I just want to show the people that an Independent can win in a state like Nebraska or any state, for that matter.” Yet Osborn did not refuse to accept any of the Democratic money that came into the campaign and likely won’t this time, either.

Earlier this year, Osborn was assessing his chances in the state’s politically marginal 2nd Congressional District, a seat he carried against Sen. Fischer with a margin greater than 42,000 votes.

The Nebraska Democratic Party leadership, however, said the organization would not endorse Osborn in a 2nd District race because a Democratic nominee has a good chance of winning the congressional campaign. They would be open, however, to supporting him in a race against Ricketts or GOP Gov. Jim Pillen.

Considering how well Osborn performed in the 2nd District during the 2024 campaign, his decision to bypass the open House seat and run again for the Senate is curious. Even though he wouldn’t have Democratic Party support, it is reasonable to believe his chances of winning a competitive three-way race in the Omaha anchored US House seat are better than waging a long-shot challenge against Sen. Ricketts.

While Osborn will likely attract a significant amount of national political publicity based upon his previous campaign, and money will certainly come from national liberal individuals and sources, a race against Sen. Ricketts will be considerably difficult irrespective of how the national political climate might develop.

In his three statewide races since first being elected Governor in 2014, Ricketts has averaged 59.6% of the vote. This figure includes his 62.6 – 37.4 percent lone US Senate victory in 2024. Ricketts entered the Senate as the appointed replacement for incumbent Ben Sasse (R) when Sasse resigned to head the University of Florida. As such, Sen. Ricketts had to run in 2024 to fill the balance of the unexpired term and now must enter into another campaign to secure a full six-year stint.

The 2026 Nebraska Senate race again promises to launch some political fireworks, but it is highly likely that the end result will once again place Pete Ricketts in the winner’s circle on election night.