No Need for Term Limits?

Happy Thanksgiving, everyone.
Enjoy your holiday; we’ll be back after the weekend.

By Jim Ellis — Wednesday, Nov. 27, 2024

For at least two decades, groups of activists have been arguing for federal term limits to be applied to the US Senate and House of Representatives, just as they are in many state legislatures; but, are they needed in today’s political climate?

For virtually the entire last decade on congressional commencement day, a majority of the House members had served three full terms or less. The same will be the case in the new 119th House being sworn into office on Jan. 3.

At this point in looking at the incoming House of Representatives, 239 members will have served three full terms or less when the oath of office is administered.

Examining the entire incoming body as a whole and even counting the two uncalled races in California, the mean average length of individual service for the 434 members is 10.1 years, and the median average is seven years. (The 434 number includes Reps. Mike Waltz (R-FL) and Elise Stefanik (R-NY) because they will still be members at the time of commencement even though they will be soon leaving for Trump Administration posts, but does not include ex-Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) who has resigned.)

These statistics are typically within the range that term limits advocates suggest. Yet, the incoming 119th Congress, as have the bodies since the 112th, have achieved similar seniority levels, at least for the majority within the House, without imposing artificial limits on all members.

Turning to the Senate, the new body will feature incumbents who have served slightly over two terms, meaning 12.4 years to be exact. Of course, senators have six-year terms as opposed to the House members, who must run every two years. The median average is exactly two terms, which is again the number that most term limits activists claim is appropriate for a senator.

The longest serving senator, or “Dean,” is Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), who was first elected in 1980. Following him is Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) with 40 years, and Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) with 32 years of service. In the House, the two longest serving members are Reps. Hal Rogers (R-KY) and Chris Smith (R-NJ). They, like Sen. Grassley, were first elected in 1980 and have 44 years of seniority. They are closely followed by former House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD). He was elected in a May 1981 special election.

A total of 13 senators have been members for at least 20 years, and just the aforementioned three for 30 years or longer. In the House, 54 members, or an almost identical 12.4 percent compared to the Senate’s 13 percent, have 20 years of service. A total of 19 representatives have 30 or more years of congressional experience, a fraction of the full body at just 4.4 percent.

Therefore, the prevailing wisdom that members of Congress stay decades in their positions causing the body to lack sufficient turnover appears disproved by the current statistics.

Since the two congressional chambers have a mix of fresh blood and experienced members some 235 years since formation, again alludes to the founding fathers’ wisdom in building the legislative system. It also appears that allowing the people’s votes to decide who serves in Congress as opposed to a bureaucratic procedure is likely a more reflective indicator of the country’s political leanings.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *