Category Archives: Senate

Another Senate Opening?

By Jim Ellis — Tuesday, Sept. 2, 2025

Senate

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA)

Media rumors had been routinely circulating through most of this year saying that Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst (R) was contemplating retirement, and apparently such a decision is about to be confirmed.

According to printed Iowa sources, it is expected that Sen. Ernst will imminently announce her retirement thus creating an eighth Senate open seat for the 2026 campaign.

Should Sen. Ernst pass on running for a third term as now firmly predicted, the Republicans would still be in strong position to hold the open seat. Waiting in the wings with the chance to become a consensus GOP candidate is three-term Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-Marion/Cedar Rapids) who has convincingly made what should be a politically marginal northeast Iowa 2nd District into a safe domain.

Hinson, a former news anchor for a Cedar Rapids television station, came to Congress in the 2020 election when she unseated first-term Democratic Rep. Abby Finkenauer in the pre-redistricting 1st CD. She has since averaged 55.6 percent of the vote in her two re-elections. In the 2022 race, she defeated a strong Democratic candidate, then-state Sen. Liz Mathis, who was also a former Cedar Rapids news anchor, with 54.1 percent of the vote.

The Democratic Senate field features state Sen. Zach Wahls (D-Des Moines), state Rep. Josh Turek (D-Council Bluffs), Des Moines School Board chair Jackie Norris, and local Chamber of Commerce executive Nathan Sage. Likely the strongest potential Democrat and the party’s lone statewide officeholder, State Auditor Rob Sand, is already in the open Governor’s race.

The absence of Rep. Hinson in her 2nd CD would make the succeeding House race much more interesting. Already, four Democrats had announced their candidacy against Rep. Hinson including state Rep. Lindsay James (D-Dubuque). A new Republican nominee would have some ground to make up and likely find themselves in a competitive toss-up general election race.

Of the eight open Senate races, both parties must defend four seats. It appears Democrats will have little trouble in holding Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin’s seat, though an expensive and hard fought primary is expected before the March 17 primary election.

The eventual Democratic nominee in Minnesota, and consensus candidate Rep. Chris Pappas (D-Manchester) from New Hampshire, have the inside track to holding their respective open seats to succeed retiring Sens. Tina Smith (D-MN) and Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH).

The Michigan open race to replace retiring Sen. Gary Peters (D), will be hard fought and likely one of two premier national Senate races. GOP former Rep. Mike Rogers is becoming a consensus Republican candidate. The Democrats will have to maneuver through a competitive primary that won’t be decided until August among Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Birmingham), state Sen. Mallory McMorrow (D-Royal Oak), and former Wayne County Health Director Abdul El-Sayed.

The open North Carolina campaign will be just as tough as Michigan’s, although in this case the general election participants are already known: former Governor Roy Cooper for the Democrats and ex-Republican National Committee chairman Michael Whatley.

Alabama Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R) is risking his seat to enter his state’s open Governor’s race, a gambit that appears to be a safe bet. In his wake, Rep. Barry Moore (R-Enterprise) and Attorney General Steve Marshall (R) will be the principal contenders in the open Senate contest with the primary victor becoming the prohibitive general election favorite.

Without Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear (D) in the open Kentucky Senate race, it appears a competitive Republican primary will determine outgoing former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R) successor. The leading contenders are former Attorney General and 2023 gubernatorial nominee Daniel Cameron, Rep. Andy Barr (R-Lexington), and self-funding businessman Nate Morris.

Two other Senators are running for Governor – Michael Bennet (D-CO) and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) – and possibly California’s Alex Padilla (D) joining them, but the trio are not risking their seats. All would be favored to win open Governor’s races, meaning each would appoint their own successors after assuming their new office.

Added to the eight open seat races portends a large number of freshman Senators being sworn into office at the beginning of 2027.

Once Again, Ernst Polling Is Close

By Jim Ellis — Thursday, Aug. 28, 2025

Senate

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA)

In her two previous victorious Iowa US Senate races, Republican Joni Ernst defied the aggregate polling universe, and a new Public Policy Polling survey of the 2026 campaign suggests we may see this familiar pattern repeat.

As a whole in both 2014 and 2020, the pollster universe underestimated Ernst’s political strength and miscast her campaigns as being too close to call when they weren’t.

In Sen. Ernst’s first statewide election, running from her position as a state Senator, she defeated then-US Rep. Bruce Braley (D) by more than eight percentage points, or a full six points above her average polling lead according to the Real Clear Politics Polling Archives.

In her re-election bid from five years ago against Des Moines businesswoman Theresa Greenfield, Sen. Ernst headed into Election Day with just over a one point average edge, again according to the RCP Polling Archives, yet won with close to a seven-point cushion.

The new PPP Iowa poll (Aug. 18-19; 572 registered Iowa voters; live interview and text) finds Sen. Ernst with only toss-up leads over a series of largely unknown, from a statewide perspective, Democratic candidates.

According to the Public Policy Polling results, Sen. Ernst would lead state Sen. Zach Wahls (D-Des Moines), only 43-42 percent; she tops Des Moines School Board chair Jackie Norris, 45-42 percent; and posts a pair of 45-41 percent advantages over local Chamber of Commerce executive Nathan Sage and state Rep. Josh Turek (D-Council Bluffs).

In reviewing the Polling Archives from her two previous statewide races, we saw Sen. Ernst beginning well behind.

In 2014, against Braley, Sen. Ernst trailed in the first published poll – in July of 2013 and again according to PPP – by a 13 percentage point margin, 45-33. Over the course of the 2014 campaign, 45 statewide surveys were publicly released from 14 different pollsters.

Within the 45 poll universe, Sen. Ernst led in 19, but none among the first nine released surveys (down an average of 7.1 points). In the campaign’s closing stage, her average percentage lead was 2.3 from the six polls released during the Oct. 27 to Nov. 3 period, yet her actual victory margin over Braley was 8.5 percent.

In 2020, this time as the incumbent seeking her first re-election, we saw a similar pattern unfold. In the ’20 race, the Real Clear Polling Archives reports a total of 19 Iowa Senate race polls being released from nine different polling organizations beginning in early April of the election year.

The first released poll again came from PPP with a survey ending on May 1, 2020. It projected Sen. Ernst as having a 43-42 percent edge over Greenfield, the same percentage this new 2025 poll finds her leading opposite state Sen. Wahls.

Within the 19-poll universe that the RCP Polling Archives tracked in the 2020 campaign, Sen. Ernst led in only seven of the polls and trailed by an average of just under three percentage points through the period ending Oct. 24 (a total of 14 released polls). In the final five polls, during the Oct. 27 through Nov. 2 period, Sen. Ernst built an average polling point lead of only 1.4 according to the Archives’ calculations but won the race on Nov. 3 by 6.6 percent.

We saw similar polling underestimates in President Trump’s three Iowa campaigns. In 2016, again with data from the Polling Archives, 26 presidential polls were conducted in the Hawkeye State from Aug. 9, 2015 through Nov. 4, 2016. Within the 26-poll universe, Hillary Clinton led in 10 with four ties. Looking at the final three polls from Nov. 1 through Nov. 4, Trump led in two with an average three-poll lead of three percentage points. On Nov. 8, 2016, he carried Iowa with a 9.5 percent margin spread.

In 2020, though Trump would lose the national election, he again carried Iowa with a greater than predicted margin. In this election, 27 polls were conducted from the period of Feb. 2, 2020 through Nov. 2. The polling universe was better in this election, as they forecast Trump to be leading Joe Biden in 15 of the polls with three ties. In the final five polls from Oct. 27 through Nov. 2, he led in four of the surveys with an average edge of two percentage points. Again, his final margin on Nov. 3 was much larger: 8.5 points.

In 2024, Iowa polling became a point of national contention as the state’s pollster deemed most accurate, Selzer & Company, projected a Kamala Harris lead of three percentage points in a poll concluded on Oct. 31.

President Trump would carry the state on Nov. 5 by a 13.2 percent margin, meaning the Selzer miss was a whopping 16-plus points.

Only three presidential polls were released during the closing days of the Iowa 2024 cycle. The other two pollsters, Emerson College and Insider Advantage, were much closer to the final result (Trump plus-10 and plus-6, respectively), but even they underestimated the Republican strength.

While the early 2025 Public Policy Polling survey again depicts Sen. Ernst in a potentially close race, this is nothing new for her Iowa Senate campaigns. If polling history is any indication, the end result will likely tell a much different story.

Husted, Ramaswamy Lead in New Poll

By Jim Ellis — Tuesday, Aug. 26, 2025

Senate

Republican Vivek Ramaswamy / Photo by Gage Skidmore

Both appointed Sen. Jon Husted (R) and businessman Vivek Ramaswamy (R) lead in a new statewide Ohio 2026 general election poll, and the data also contain some interesting ancillary results.

Emerson College conducted the new statewide Ohio poll (Aug. 18-19; 1,000 registered Ohio voters; 490 likely OH Republican primary voters; 383 likely Ohio Democratic primary voters; multiple sampling techniques) and the results project Sen. Husted leading former Sen. Sherrod Brown (D), 50-44 percent. This is the first Senate survey released since Brown officially announced that he will make a political comeback.

In the Governor’s contest, Ramaswamy, the endorsed Ohio Republican Party candidate, leads former state Health Director Amy Acton (D) 49-39 percent, and former Congressman and ex-US Senate candidate Tim Ryan (D) 49-41 percent. Last week, Ryan said he would make a decision about entering the Governor’s race by the end of September.

President Trump’s job approval score was 49:42 positive to negative, with unsurprisingly almost all of the Republicans approving and a near unanimous Democratic segment disapproving. As part of the survey, Emerson then tested the personal approval index of nine Buckeye State public figures.

In the Senate race, appointed incumbent Husted’s favorability index is 33:28 positive to negative, while former Sen. Brown is better known but has a tighter favorable lean, 44:42.

Interestingly, the only one of the nine tested political personalities to post an upside-down personal rating was first-term Sen. Bernie Moreno (R) at 38:42. On the job approval score, Gov. Mike DeWine (R) also scored in negative territory, 32:40.

The political figure with the lowest unfavorable personal rating (17 percent), is Lt. Gov. Jim Tressel (R), the former Ohio State University head football coach. Tressel still has not completely ruled out running for Governor, but it appears highly unlikely that he will enter the statewide race.

Vice President and former Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance (R) posted a 48:43 percent favorability index, which also is the highest individual negative score of anyone tested but, again, the split is purely partisan with Republicans overwhelmingly favorable and Democrats viewing him unfavorably in virtually equal proportions.

To underscore the partisanship view, when asking this sample of Ohio Republican voters who they would favor to succeed President Trump in 2028, favorite son Vance was the overpowering choice, 55-9-7-6-4 percent over Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, Ohio gubernatorial candidate Ramaswamy, and former UN Ambassador and 2024 presidential candidate Nikki Haley, respectively.

The Democratic sample was also polled regarding their next presidential preference. On this question it is California Gov. Gavin Newsom who placed first within the Democratic sample of 388 respondents, which is a low number for a state the size of Ohio. Irrespective of the potential sampling flaw, Newsom captured a 20 percent preference figure. Obviously, this is a very low number, but it is still tops among the tested potential candidates.

In what should be considered bad news for ex-US Transportation Secretary and former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, he finished behind Newsom with only 15 percent support. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) was third with eight percent, followed by a three-way tie with seven percent apiece among Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), a two-time presidential candidate, former Vice President and 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, and Minnesota Governor and 2024 Democratic Vice Presidential nominee Tim Walz.

Sen. Sanders, referring to his age (he will be 87 years old during the 2028 campaign), is indicating that he will not run for President again. The Harris-Walz showing is particularly poor for the most recent presidential ticket nominees within a Democratic Party segment cell.

The Iowa Political Hotbed

By Jim Ellis — Monday, Aug. 25, 2025

Iowa

The Hawkeye State of Iowa will be among the nation’s hottest political domains in the next year, featuring competitive races from the top of the ballot to the bottom. In the past week, we have seen new action occurring in several of the races.

Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst (R)

Sen. Joni Ernst (R) has not yet formally announced for re-election, and rumors that she would retire and yield to Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-Marion/Cedar Rapids) as the consensus Republican candidate, have dissipated. Sen. Ernst says she will declare her intentions in the fall.

The fact that she has raised $6.7 million during her current term and maintains $3.4 million cash-on-hand is a good indication that she is running.

One person who won’t be in the Senatorial field is state Rep. J.D. Scholten (D-Sioux City). Previously declaring for the Senate, Scholten this week announced that he is dropping his statewide bid and endorsed state Rep. Josh Turek’s (D-Council Bluffs) US Senate effort. Also in the Democratic primary race are state Sen. Zach Wahls (D-Des Moines), Des Moines School Board chair Jackie Norris, and local Chamber of Commerce executive Nathan Sage.

Sen. Ernst will be a strong favorite for re-election, but it is obvious the Democrats are going to make this race a national target.

With Gov. Kim Reynolds (R) retiring, the 2026 Iowa Governor’s race will be an open contest. Five Republicans have announced their intention to run including three-term Rep. Randy Feenstra (R-Hull/Sioux City). In addition, two sitting state legislators, one former state Representative, and ex-State Administrative Services Director Adam Steen have all formally entered the Republican primary.

The Democrats are fielding four candidates, but all political eyes are on Iowa’s lone Democratic statewide elected official, State Auditor Rob Sand. A likely Feenstra-Sand general election will lead the ballot and promises to become a competitive race. Rep. Feenstra, however, begins the campaign as the favorite.

We will also see competitive action in all four of Iowa’s congressional districts.

Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-Le Claire) will face challenges in the Republican primary and general election. Her 56 percent showing in the 2024 GOP primary against an opponent who literally spent no money and winning the general election with just a 799-vote cushion leaves her in vulnerable position. Her 2024 primary opponent, advertising executive David Pautsch, is returning for a re-match and promises to raise and spend money in the coming race.

The 2022 and ’24 Democratic nominee, former state Rep. Christina Bohannan, returns for a third run. She faces credible Democratic opposition, however, in the person of former state Rep. Bob Krause and attorney Taylor Wettach.

Rep. Hinson just drew a formidable Democratic opponent this week. State Rep. Lindsay James (D-Dubuque) formally announced her candidacy and will launch a spirited general election campaign. She faces three announced Democrats in the party primary, none of whom have ever been elected to any office.

After flirting with running for Governor and even moving to the open 4th District, which is a much safer Republican CD than his own, Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Bondurant) will seek re-election in his Des Moines anchored 3rd District. IA-3 is politically marginal (Dave’s Redistricting App partisan lean: 49.8R – 47.0D), which guarantees a close finish.

Two strong Democrats, state Sen. Sarah Trone Garriott (D-Des Moines) and former state House Minority Leader Jennifer Konfrst, are the major contenders. This district’s electorate has unseated two incumbents, one from each party, since 2018.

With Rep. Feenstra leaving the House to run for Governor, the open western 4th District will largely be decided in the Republican primary (Dave’s Redistricting App partisan lean: 61.9R – 34.9D). State House Majority Leader Matt Windchitl (R-Harrison County) and Siouxland Chamber of Commerce president Chris McGowan appear to be the leading GOP candidates.

The Iowa primary is scheduled for June 2. The state has a post-nomination election process for races that end with no candidate receiving 35% of the vote. A special party convention is then called for the affected district or state, with delegates choosing the eventual party nominee.

As we can see, all of the state’s most important races will offer a high degree of competition throughout next year. Expect Iowa to draw major national political attention in the coming months.

Cornyn Rebounds

By Jim Ellis — Wednesday, Aug. 20, 2025

Senate

Texas Sen. John Cornyn (R)

For the first time this year, Sen. John Cornyn has posted a polling lead over Attorney General Ken Paxton in their 2026 Texas Republican primary battle.

Emerson College tested the Lone Star State electorate (Aug. 11-12; 1,000 registered Texas voters; 491 self-identified Texas Republican voters; multiple sampling techniques) and the results project Sen. Cornyn only edging AG Paxton by a scant 30-29 percent, but the survey clearly shows positive movement for the veteran incumbent.

A dozen Republican primary polls, including the current Emerson College study, have been released since the beginning of the year from 12 different pollsters (eight Republican firms, one Democratic pollster, and three university research departments).

Though the Emerson data still shows weakness for Sen. Cornyn, it detects a vastly improved incumbent standing. In the 11 polls conducted prior to Emerson’s, Paxton averaged a lead of just under 16 percentage points. In seven of the 11, the three-term AG reached or topped the 50 percent mark.

More data needs to be studied in order to confirm this new trend, especially since the Emerson poll consisted of registered voters as opposed to those likely to cast their ballot in a Republican primary. Additionally, the sample size of 491 self-identified Republicans is low for a state the size of Texas and one where GOP primary turnout reached almost 2 million voters the last time Sen. Cornyn appeared on the ballot (2020). Furthermore, the fact that Sen. Cornyn only reached a 30 percent preference figure is also a negative sign for a four-term incumbent within his own party.

Conversely, the results clearly show movement in Cornyn’s favor and coincide with a recent Cornyn campaign blitz designed to intensify a Paxton negative personal image. The new poll results suggest the Cornyn campaign strategy is working as Paxton is losing support even though the Senator’s preference number doesn’t yet appear to be rising. In the previously mentioned dozen polls, Emerson inclusive, Sen. Cornyn’s average is 33.2 percent.

The 2026 Texas Senate race will be exorbitantly expensive. In 2024, Sen. Ted Cruz (R) and then-Rep. Colin Allred (D), including approximately $64 million in outside expenditures that helped both candidates, spent an aggregate of $266 million. It is probable that such an amount will be equaled or topped in 2026.

According to the 2nd Quarter Federal Election Commission financial disclosure reports for the current election cycle, Sen. Cornyn has raised over $9.8 million for the 2026 campaign and holds almost $9 million in his campaign account. Paxton reported campaign receipts of $2.9 million with slightly over $2.5 million cash-on-hand.

Because he is a recently announced 2026 candidate, Allred has not yet had to file a disclosure report for the current campaign. For his 2024 effort, Allred raised over $94 million, a total that ranked as fourth-best among all Senate candidates. Therefore, we can again expect to see him well-funded for the coming campaign.

There is still some discussion that former Congressman, ex-US Senate, and former presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke could enter the ’26 Senate campaign. If he were to become a candidate, the Democratic primary would also become competitive. Since the Allred announcement, however, talk of an O’Rourke Senate campaign has faded, though the former El Paso Congressman is certainly politically active.

O’Rourke began raising money to fund the state House Representatives who fled Texas in order to prevent obtaining a quorum in the special legislative session. The politicians made their move to at least postpone the legislature from passing a new congressional redistricting map.

Because a law was passed to fine any member who purposely missed session for legislative purposes, O’Rourke went to work funding a non-profit political organization to pay the amassed fines. A Texas judge has struck down his effort, however, since the law purposely prevented political money from being used to pay the personal fines.

Along with Arkansas and North Carolina, the March 3 Texas primary is the earliest in the nation. Therefore, we can expect to see heavy political action coming from the Lone Star State during the latter half of this year.

Krishnamoorthi Expands Lead;
A Crowded 32-Candidate TX-18 Field

By Jim Ellis — Friday, Aug. 15, 2025

Senate

Illinois Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Schaumburg)

A new survey conducted for a Super PAC supporting Illinois Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Schaumburg) finds the Congressman expanding his previous lead in the open US Senate Democratic primary. Three major candidates are vying for the opportunity of succeeding retiring Sen. Dick Durbin (D).

According to the A to Z poll (conducted for the Impact Fund Super PAC; Aug. 8-10; 615 likely Illinois Democratic primary voters; online), Rep. Krishnamoorthi holds a 38-17-7 percent lead over Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton and Rep. Robin Kelly (D-Matteson/Chicago), respectively. When those leaning to one of the candidates are added, the Krishnamoorthi advantage expands to 51-28-13 percent.

In June, the GBAO research firm released an Illinois Senate survey (June 5-10; 1,200 likely Illinois Democratic primary voters) that posted Krishnamoorthi to a 32-19-14 percent edge over Lt. Gov. Stratton and Rep. Kelly.

The northern Illinois Congressman also leads in another critical category, that of fundraising. According to the 2nd Quarter Federal Election Commission campaign finance disclosure reports, Rep. Krishnamoorthi had raised at the June 30 reporting deadline almost $12.7 million with a cash-on-hand figure of $11.76 million, far above his two opponents. Stratton, who entered the race in late April, attracted just over $1 million and held $666,000 in her federal campaign account. Rep. Kelly posted $2.4 million in receipts and $2.2 million cash-on-hand.

It is likely that each candidate will see support coming from outside organizations, and it is a certainty that the Impact Fund will be spending to help Krishnamoorthi.

Stratton is counting on Gov. J.B. Pritzker (D), who has endorsed her candidacy, and his allies to come to the table with financial support, but such has yet to materialize. Rep. Kelly will likely have enough in the way of financial backing to be competitive, but the early indicators are certainly pointing Rep. Krishnamoorthi’s way.

The March 17 plurality primary is the actual election in Illinois since it is unlikely the Republican Party will be able to field a credible candidate to compete in a state so solidly in the Democratic camp. The Dave’s Redistricting App statisticians calculate a 55.5D – 39.9R Illinois partisan lean.

In the past two national elections, President Trump lost in the Land of Lincoln. In 2020, President Biden defeated him 57-41 percent, and Kamala Harris posted a 54-43 percent victory margin last November.

TX-18

A new internal campaign poll was released of the TX-18 special election scheduled for Nov. 4. A large field of 32 announced candidates are competing for the opportunity of replacing the late Rep. Sylvester Turner (D-Houston). The eventual winner, however, may have a very short tenure in Congress.

Former Houston City Councilwoman and ex-statewide candidate Amanda Edwards (D) released the results of her campaign’s Brilliant Corners survey (July 20-23; 500 likely TX-18 special election voters; live interview) and found Edwards leading former Miss Universe contestant Carmen Maria Montiel (R), state Rep. Jolanda Jones (D-Houston), Harris County Attorney Christian Menefee (D), and George Foreman IV (I), 18-12-11-10-6 percent, respectively.

The results slightly conflict with a University of Houston poll conducted earlier in July (July 9-18; 400 likely TX-18 registered voters from a sample pool of 2,300 Harris County registered voters; SMS text) that found Edwards and Menefee tied with 19 percent, Montiel and Jones deadlocked at 14 percent preference, and Foreman posting four percent support.

The concluding analysis suggests that no one even reaching the 20 percent support plateau translates into a wide open race with much time remaining before voters begin to cast their ballots. Considering the volume of candidates, even if several do not ultimately qualify, it becomes a foregone conclusion that the contest will advance to a runoff election between the top two finishers regardless of political party affiliation. After the initial vote, Gov. Greg Abbott (R) will schedule the runoff once the primary result becomes official.

Yet, regardless of the special election outcome it is likely when the new redistricting map passes that the winner will be paired in a new 18th District with Rep. Al Green (D-Houston).

Therefore, the new congressional member will immediately find him or herself in a primary campaign, likely against Rep. Green, that will be held March 3. Thus, having to compete in a runoff election probably in early January only then be forced to face Rep. Green in a partisan Democratic primary just weeks later will likely be enough to yield the special election winner a very limited congressional tenure.

Ex-Sen. Sherrod Brown Returns

By Jim Ellis — Thursday, Aug. 14, 2025

Senate

Former Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown (D)

Former Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown (D) announced earlier this week that he will return for a comeback attempt next year after losing his seat last November to Republican Bernie Moreno.

Though Brown is a prodigious fundraiser and has had a successful decades-long political career, the numbers suggest reversing his 2024 loss will be a formidable task.

Last November, now-Sen. Moreno defeated Brown by 206,434 votes, or a victory percentage margin of 50.1 – 46.5. What makes Brown’s task more difficult in 2026 is that he actually received more votes in his defeat than he did in winning his previous election, a 2018 re-election victory over then-Rep. Jim Renacci (R). The cumulative results suggest the state is undergoing a major electoral shift.

In 2018, then-Sen. Brown was re-elected to a third term with a 53.4 – 46.6 percent win over Renacci. In that election, he garnered 2,355,923 votes. In his losing 2024 campaign, Sen. Brown’s vote total was 2,650,949, or 295,026 votes more than he received in his 2018 winning campaign.

In reality, even though Brown increased his vote total from six years previously, the 2024 end result proved a major underperformance. Because the Ohio turnout in the 2024 presidential election year was 29.2 percent higher than in the 2018 mid-term election, Sen. Brown would have needed to increase his vote total by 690,914 votes just to keep pace with his winning vote ratio from seven years ago.

Therefore, even with growing his vote total in 2024, Brown’s vote performance as it relates to his previous victory was substantially deficient.

In terms of the Ohio political landscape, Sen. Brown carried only 16 of the state’s 88 counties in 2018, yet his margins were large enough in the big counties to record a comfortable victory. In 2024, the counties he carried were cut in half, dropping to just eight of the 88 local entities.

Comparing Sen. Brown’s county win totals to that of President Biden in the same election year of 2024, the latter man carried one less. Only Lorain County, which Brown represented when he was in the US House and state legislature, voted for him in 2024, but chose President Trump in the national election. The other seven Biden counties also voted for Brown. The same seven counties supported Biden in 2020.

The loyal Democratic counties are no surprise and begin with the entities housing the three cities known as Ohio’s “C-PAC,” Cincinnati (Hamilton County), Cleveland (Cuyahoga), and Columbus (Franklin). The other counties continuing to vote Democratic are Lucas (Toledo), Montgomery (Dayton), and Summit (Akron). The only rural county voting with the Democrats lies along the state’s southeastern border shared with West Virginia, Athens County.

Therefore, for Brown, or any other statewide Ohio Democrat, to gain traction, the party nominees will have to substantially increase their performance over what we saw in 2024 and even 2020.

Though his vote totals did not yield a re-election victory, Sen. Brown did oversee a very successful 2024 fundraising operation. His campaign raised just over $103 million for his failed re-election effort, which was the second highest of any US Senate candidate, behind only Texas Sen. Ted Cruz’s (R) $107-plus million from a state more than twice the size of Ohio.

In contrast, Moreno raised just less than $27 million, which included a personal loan of $4.5 million to his campaign account. Outside spending, however, evened the resource imbalance, accounting for over $190 million toward the Republican cause as compared to just beyond $95 million to assist the Democratic side.

After the 2024 campaign, Brown reported a cash-on-hand figure of $394,230. Since he has not, heretofore, become an official candidate, we will not see a Brown campaign financial disclosure statement until mid-October.

For his part, appointed Sen. Jon Husted (R) has had a robust fundraising spurt since assuming the office after then-Sen. J.D. Vance (R) departed to become Vice President. Sen. Husted has raised just over $3 million and reports $2.65 million in his campaign account.

Sen. Husted is also an accomplished Ohio politician. Before running as Lieutenant Governor on Gov. Mike DeWine’s (R) ticket in the past two gubernatorial statewide elections, Husted was twice elected as Ohio’s Secretary of State, won an election to the state Senate, and served four terms in the state House of Representatives, including four years as Speaker.

The 2026 Ohio campaign appears to be another Senate race where we can already identify the general election combatants. Watch for another very expensive campaign to unfold, but with Ohio’s move to the right, Sen. Husted should be considered the favored candidate. The 2026 special election winner will serve the balance of the current term and then be eligible to run for a six-year term in 2028.