Category Archives: Election Analysis

The Iowa Political Hotbed

By Jim Ellis — Monday, Aug. 25, 2025

Iowa

The Hawkeye State of Iowa will be among the nation’s hottest political domains in the next year, featuring competitive races from the top of the ballot to the bottom. In the past week, we have seen new action occurring in several of the races.

Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst (R)

Sen. Joni Ernst (R) has not yet formally announced for re-election, and rumors that she would retire and yield to Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-Marion/Cedar Rapids) as the consensus Republican candidate, have dissipated. Sen. Ernst says she will declare her intentions in the fall.

The fact that she has raised $6.7 million during her current term and maintains $3.4 million cash-on-hand is a good indication that she is running.

One person who won’t be in the Senatorial field is state Rep. J.D. Scholten (D-Sioux City). Previously declaring for the Senate, Scholten this week announced that he is dropping his statewide bid and endorsed state Rep. Josh Turek’s (D-Council Bluffs) US Senate effort. Also in the Democratic primary race are state Sen. Zach Wahls (D-Des Moines), Des Moines School Board chair Jackie Norris, and local Chamber of Commerce executive Nathan Sage.

Sen. Ernst will be a strong favorite for re-election, but it is obvious the Democrats are going to make this race a national target.

With Gov. Kim Reynolds (R) retiring, the 2026 Iowa Governor’s race will be an open contest. Five Republicans have announced their intention to run including three-term Rep. Randy Feenstra (R-Hull/Sioux City). In addition, two sitting state legislators, one former state Representative, and ex-State Administrative Services Director Adam Steen have all formally entered the Republican primary.

The Democrats are fielding four candidates, but all political eyes are on Iowa’s lone Democratic statewide elected official, State Auditor Rob Sand. A likely Feenstra-Sand general election will lead the ballot and promises to become a competitive race. Rep. Feenstra, however, begins the campaign as the favorite.

We will also see competitive action in all four of Iowa’s congressional districts.

Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-Le Claire) will face challenges in the Republican primary and general election. Her 56 percent showing in the 2024 GOP primary against an opponent who literally spent no money and winning the general election with just a 799-vote cushion leaves her in vulnerable position. Her 2024 primary opponent, advertising executive David Pautsch, is returning for a re-match and promises to raise and spend money in the coming race.

The 2022 and ’24 Democratic nominee, former state Rep. Christina Bohannan, returns for a third run. She faces credible Democratic opposition, however, in the person of former state Rep. Bob Krause and attorney Taylor Wettach.

Rep. Hinson just drew a formidable Democratic opponent this week. State Rep. Lindsay James (D-Dubuque) formally announced her candidacy and will launch a spirited general election campaign. She faces three announced Democrats in the party primary, none of whom have ever been elected to any office.

After flirting with running for Governor and even moving to the open 4th District, which is a much safer Republican CD than his own, Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Bondurant) will seek re-election in his Des Moines anchored 3rd District. IA-3 is politically marginal (Dave’s Redistricting App partisan lean: 49.8R – 47.0D), which guarantees a close finish.

Two strong Democrats, state Sen. Sarah Trone Garriott (D-Des Moines) and former state House Minority Leader Jennifer Konfrst, are the major contenders. This district’s electorate has unseated two incumbents, one from each party, since 2018.

With Rep. Feenstra leaving the House to run for Governor, the open western 4th District will largely be decided in the Republican primary (Dave’s Redistricting App partisan lean: 61.9R – 34.9D). State House Majority Leader Matt Windchitl (R-Harrison County) and Siouxland Chamber of Commerce president Chris McGowan appear to be the leading GOP candidates.

The Iowa primary is scheduled for June 2. The state has a post-nomination election process for races that end with no candidate receiving 35% of the vote. A special party convention is then called for the affected district or state, with delegates choosing the eventual party nominee.

As we can see, all of the state’s most important races will offer a high degree of competition throughout next year. Expect Iowa to draw major national political attention in the coming months.

New Texas Map Passes;
Rep. Chip Roy Running for AG

(Click on map above to see full-size detail.)

By Jim Ellis — Friday, Aug. 22, 2025

Texas

REDISTRICTING — The Texas state House of Representatives, with the Democrats returning to create a quorum, passed the new redistricting map on a party line vote. The bill then moved to the state Senate where passage became pro forma since the body passed the plan in the previous legislative special session. Gov. Greg Abbott (R) is expected to sign the new map into law as early as today.

While Republicans believe they can gain five seats in the Texas delegation, the number is largely predicated on winning Hispanic voters in numbers that President Trump similarly attained. Whether the new Trump Hispanic voter returns in a midterm election to vote the Republican line becomes a point of conjecture.

The new Texas map creates three open seats, two of which, one in Houston and the other in the San Antonio area, have large Hispanic populations. To reach their goal of converting five districts, the Republican candidates will have to carry the three open seats:

District 9 (Houston)
District 32 (Dallas area)
District 35 (San Antonio area)

Also, Republicans must defeat Reps. Henry Cuellar (D-Laredo) and Vicente Gonzalez (D-McAllen) in South Texas Districts 28 and 34, respectively.

Former Congresswoman Mayra Flores (R), who lost to Rep. Gonzalez 51-49 percent in November while President Trump was carrying the 34th District in the present configuration (51.8 – 47.4 percent), announced earlier in the year that she would move to District 28 to oppose Rep. Cuellar. Since District 34, now moving northward toward Corpus Christi and losing the McAllen portion of the current CD, becomes more Republican it is unclear if she will go through with the plan to run in CD-28 or return for a second re-match with Rep. Gonzalez in new CD-34.

The new map pairs several Democratic members: Reps. Lloyd Doggett (D-Austin) and Greg Casar (D-Austin), although Rep. Doggett is saying he will retire if this map stands; likely, Reps. Julie Johnson (D-Farmers Branch/Dallas) and Marc Veasey (D-Ft. Worth) in a Dallas County 33rd District that would contain neither of their home bases; and Rep. Al Green (D-Houston) with the winner of the TX-18 special election to be held later this year.

Rep. Chip Roy (R-Austin) — Rep. Roy, who had been publicly contemplating entering the open Texas Attorney General’s race, yesterday announced his candidacy for that position, thus opening his Central Texas 21st Congressional District for the 2026 election cycle.

Counting the Roy open seat along with the Texas trio of new open CDs, the national US House open seat count would rise to 29 (15R-11D-3 New).

Once the four special elections are filled beginning on Sept. 9 in Virginia with the VA-11 district and concluding with TX-18, which could stretch into January (under Texas election law, the Governor calls a special runoff once it becomes certain that the top finisher will not reach the majority support level in the initial election), the national open-seat count will revert to 25.

In the GOP Attorney General’s primary, Congressman Roy will face state Sen. Mayes Middleton (R-Galveston), state Sen. Joan Huffman (R-Houston), former Assistant US Attorney General Aaron Reitz, and possibly others. For the Democrats, state Sen. Nathan Johnson (D-Dallas) and former Galveston Mayor and ex-AG candidate Joe Jaworski are the announced contenders.

The new 21st District will be similar but not identical to the seat that Rep. Roy is vacating. The new TX-21 will contain northern Bexar County (San Antonio), move north to capture Comal and part of Hays County which borders Austin, and then travels west into the Texas Hill Country to include the flood-ravaged area around Kerrville when the Guadalupe River overflowed on the 4th of July.

The current CD-21 partisan lean is 61.0R – 36.7D. The new 21st would lose about 30 percent of the territory to other districts but gain a commensurate amount. The new partisan lean, again through the work of the Dave’s Redistricting App statisticians, would calculate as a similar 60.3R – 38.4D. Therefore, it is highly likely that Rep. Roy’s successor will be the winner of the next Republican nomination campaign.

Arizona Governor:
Rep. Schweikert Considers Bid

By Jim Ellis — Thursday, Aug. 21, 2025

Governor

eight-term Arizona Rep. David Schweikert (R-Fountain Hills/ Scottsdale)

In a surprising development, eight-term Arizona Rep. David Schweikert (R-Fountain Hills/ Scottsdale) is confirming reports that he is considering entering the 2026 Arizona Governor’s race. Congressman Schweikert says he will make a final decision about becoming a gubernatorial candidate by the end of this month.

The fact that such a story has arisen firmly suggests he is headed toward running. In the statewide Republican primary contest are Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Gilbert), who is leading in early polling, and Karrin Taylor Robson who ran for Governor in 2022 but failed to overtake Kari Lake for the GOP nomination.

Earlier in the year, President Trump issued a dual endorsement for Rep. Biggs and Robson, but her support was recently withdrawn because the President said she was not using his backing to its fullest benefit.

With Robson likely stagnating, Rep. Schweikert may see the opportunity of overtaking
Biggs in a GOP primary race that won’t be decided until Aug. 4 of next year. The eventual Republican nominee will be highly competitive against Gov. Katie Hobbs (D) who defeated Lake by a scant 50.3 – 49.6 percent count in 2022.

The bigger national story, should Rep. Schweikert become a gubernatorial candidate, would be the battle for his open 1st Congressional District.

The 2021 Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission members didn’t do Rep. Schweikert any favors because they transformed his once safely Republican 6th District into a highly competitive 1st CD. Schweikert being convicted of 11 House ethics violations for misuse of his congressional office funds and the Federal Election Commission issuing a $175,000 fine for multiple campaign finance violations certainly didn’t help him win re-election, either.

In the last two elections, Rep. Schweikert, battling negative publicity relating to the ethics abuses and fines, recorded winning percentages of 50.4 and 51.9 percent in 2022 and 2024, respectively. The Dave’s Redistricting App statisticians calculate a 50.9R – 47.5D district partisan lean. The Down Ballot political blog prognosticators rank AZ-1 as the 18th most vulnerable seat in the House Republican Conference.

In the 2024 presidential race, Trump defeated then-Vice President Kamala Harris here 51.9 – 48.0 percent. In 2020, however, President Biden carried the seat over Trump, 50.1 – 48.6 percent. The 1st District margin was one of the reasons the national Democrat carried Arizona, which became a major cog in the Biden victory over then-President Trump.

The Grand Canyon State’s 1st CD is fully contained within Maricopa County and anchored in the city of Scottsdale. The seat also includes Rep. Schweikert’s hometown of Fountain Hills and the cities of Paradise Valley and Carefree. The voting age population is 74 percent white, 14 percent Hispanic, 5.5 percent Asian, and 4 percent black.

The most recent district voter registration totals (July 1, 2025) reveal 207,076 Republicans (38.4 percent), 179,128 (33.2 percent) non-affiliated voters, 144,592 Democrats (26.8 percent), and 8,608 (1.6 percent) minor party members for a total of 539,404 registrants. The election statistics revealing much closer results than the voter registration figures seem to project indicates that the non-affiliated group votes predominantly Democratic. Therefore, the GOP’s registration advantage is less than one observes at first glance.

Should Rep. Schweikert opt for the Governor’s race, we can expect a crowded Republican congressional primary to develop.

The Democrats are already seeing spirited competition in their primary as 11 party members have announced their candidacies, including former state Representative, physician, and 2024 congressional nominee Amish Shah, 2024 congressional candidate and former news anchor Marlene Galan-Woods, Administrative Law Judge Brian Del Vecchio, Tempe School Board member Andres Barraza, and Democratic National Committee member Mark Robert Gordon.

The AZ-1 campaign was already promising to be one of the most competitive US House races in the 2026 cycle and a major factor in deciding which party will control the chamber in the 2027-28 congressional session. As an open seat contest, this district will attract even more national political attention once the race intensifies.

Cornyn Rebounds

By Jim Ellis — Wednesday, Aug. 20, 2025

Senate

Texas Sen. John Cornyn (R)

For the first time this year, Sen. John Cornyn has posted a polling lead over Attorney General Ken Paxton in their 2026 Texas Republican primary battle.

Emerson College tested the Lone Star State electorate (Aug. 11-12; 1,000 registered Texas voters; 491 self-identified Texas Republican voters; multiple sampling techniques) and the results project Sen. Cornyn only edging AG Paxton by a scant 30-29 percent, but the survey clearly shows positive movement for the veteran incumbent.

A dozen Republican primary polls, including the current Emerson College study, have been released since the beginning of the year from 12 different pollsters (eight Republican firms, one Democratic pollster, and three university research departments).

Though the Emerson data still shows weakness for Sen. Cornyn, it detects a vastly improved incumbent standing. In the 11 polls conducted prior to Emerson’s, Paxton averaged a lead of just under 16 percentage points. In seven of the 11, the three-term AG reached or topped the 50 percent mark.

More data needs to be studied in order to confirm this new trend, especially since the Emerson poll consisted of registered voters as opposed to those likely to cast their ballot in a Republican primary. Additionally, the sample size of 491 self-identified Republicans is low for a state the size of Texas and one where GOP primary turnout reached almost 2 million voters the last time Sen. Cornyn appeared on the ballot (2020). Furthermore, the fact that Sen. Cornyn only reached a 30 percent preference figure is also a negative sign for a four-term incumbent within his own party.

Conversely, the results clearly show movement in Cornyn’s favor and coincide with a recent Cornyn campaign blitz designed to intensify a Paxton negative personal image. The new poll results suggest the Cornyn campaign strategy is working as Paxton is losing support even though the Senator’s preference number doesn’t yet appear to be rising. In the previously mentioned dozen polls, Emerson inclusive, Sen. Cornyn’s average is 33.2 percent.

The 2026 Texas Senate race will be exorbitantly expensive. In 2024, Sen. Ted Cruz (R) and then-Rep. Colin Allred (D), including approximately $64 million in outside expenditures that helped both candidates, spent an aggregate of $266 million. It is probable that such an amount will be equaled or topped in 2026.

According to the 2nd Quarter Federal Election Commission financial disclosure reports for the current election cycle, Sen. Cornyn has raised over $9.8 million for the 2026 campaign and holds almost $9 million in his campaign account. Paxton reported campaign receipts of $2.9 million with slightly over $2.5 million cash-on-hand.

Because he is a recently announced 2026 candidate, Allred has not yet had to file a disclosure report for the current campaign. For his 2024 effort, Allred raised over $94 million, a total that ranked as fourth-best among all Senate candidates. Therefore, we can again expect to see him well-funded for the coming campaign.

There is still some discussion that former Congressman, ex-US Senate, and former presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke could enter the ’26 Senate campaign. If he were to become a candidate, the Democratic primary would also become competitive. Since the Allred announcement, however, talk of an O’Rourke Senate campaign has faded, though the former El Paso Congressman is certainly politically active.

O’Rourke began raising money to fund the state House Representatives who fled Texas in order to prevent obtaining a quorum in the special legislative session. The politicians made their move to at least postpone the legislature from passing a new congressional redistricting map.

Because a law was passed to fine any member who purposely missed session for legislative purposes, O’Rourke went to work funding a non-profit political organization to pay the amassed fines. A Texas judge has struck down his effort, however, since the law purposely prevented political money from being used to pay the personal fines.

Along with Arkansas and North Carolina, the March 3 Texas primary is the earliest in the nation. Therefore, we can expect to see heavy political action coming from the Lone Star State during the latter half of this year.

California Redistricting:
The Five Targeted Seats

The proposed congressional map by California Democrats, (left) and the current map (right). Click on map to see larger image. Graphic: Dave’s Redistricting App / Joshua Metcalf)

By Jim Ellis — Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2025

Redistricting

The California proposed retribution redistricting map that key staff members at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) drew is now public, and the process to adopt such a plan is beginning this week.

In order for the California Governor and legislators to replace their current congressional map before the 2030 census is completed, the leadership must find a way to usurp the California Citizens Redistricting Commission that the voters instituted through a 2010 ballot measure. The only way to cancel the Commission map, Gov. Gavin Newsom and the majority Democrats believe, is to have another vote of the people to directly adopt a specific new map.

While the Newsom et al interpretation will likely be subject to a lawsuit with the objective of halting the process, the legislature this week will vote on a measure to place a new congressional map on a special election ballot this November. To approve a ballot referendum, each legislative chamber must do so with a two-thirds super majority. Considering the Democrats hold well over two-thirds of the seats in both the state Assembly and state Senate, placing the referendum on the ballot will likely be achieved.

Whether a majority of special election voters will adopt the map is open to question. For years, voters have listened to arguments about enacting “fair” district maps. In fact, this argument was the crux of the 2010 initiative campaign to create the citizens’ commission and 61.3 percent of the voters did so. Yet, in this special election, the message coming from Democratic leaders will now be to ‘vote yes for gerrymandering.’

Therefore, getting a majority vote on such a measure may be a more difficult political task than Gov. Newsom and his cohorts currently believe.

Thanks to the statisticians at The Down Ballot political blog, we see the data behind the proposed district configurations. The very rapidly completed calculations tell us how the 2024 and 2020 presidential elections unfolded in every new district. The statisticians also calculated how much of each current district is included in a new 2026 district.

To put the new map in context, we must remember that the current delegation is comprised of 43 Democrats and just nine Republicans. The new map is projected to possibly take the Republicans down to as few as four seats.

As we know, the DCCC California map is drawn as a retaliatory move against the new Texas redistricting plan that could be adopted this week. Projections suggest that the new map could yield as many as five additional GOP seats.

It remains an important point to underscore that Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) added redistricting issue to his special session in response to a US Justice Department directive to redraw the map. The DOJ cited a recent en banc US 5th Circuit Court of Appeals minority districts ruling that now cause some of the state’s congressional districts to become illegal.

The California Republican US House members facing the most difficult re-election situations, should the proposed map become law, are Reps. Doug LaMalfa (R-Oroville; District 1), Kevin Kiley (R-Rocklin/Sacramento; District 3), and Ken Calvert (R-Corona; District 41).

Another GOP member, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-San Diego; District 48), would find himself in a much more competitive re-election campaign, while Rep. David Valadao (R-Hanford; District 22), would see his already Democratic-leaning seat further help a Democratic candidate. President Trump, however, still carried the new District 22.

Rep. LaMalfa’s new 1st District, according to The Down Ballot statisticians, would contain just 43.8 percent of his current constituency and transform from a 61 percent Trump district to a 54 percent Kamala Harris CD.

Rep. Kiley would retain 46.8 percent of his current 3rd CD, and sees the presidential index move from 50 percent Trump to 55 percent Harris. Based upon his residence, he would technically be paired with Rep. Ami Bera (D-Sacramento; District 6), but he would likely seek re-election in CA-3.

Rep. Calvert would find himself in the worst position of all the Republicans. A total of 50.5 percent of his current 41st District constituency would be placed in new District 38, which is 56 percent Harris and could mean a pairing with Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-Whittier; District 38), though it is likely she would run in new District 41. Most of Rep. Sanchez’s constituents are in either District 38 or District 31 that fellow Democrat Gil Cisneros (D-Covina) holds, but District 41 could be open, carries a Kamala Harris percentage of 57, and runs adjacent to her current district.

Rep. Young Kim (R-La Habra) would find most of her constituency in new District 41, but a third of her voters are in new District 40, which is a 56 percent Trump seat and does not have an incumbent. We could see Kim and Calvert both running for this seat.

The Issa 48th CD would keep only 32.3 percent of its current population base, while the presidential index moves from 56 percent Trump to 52 percent Harris.

Finally for the Republicans, the Valadao 22nd District keeps 84.3 percent of its current constituency and moves from 52 percent Trump to 50 percent Trump. Therefore, the region is not as partisan as some other district iterations that Congressman Valadao has previously faced.

The other Democrats most affected would be Reps. Robert Garcia (D-Long Beach; District 42) who would retain only 35.2 percent of his constituency base; Dave Min (D-Irvine; District 47) would lose a majority of his current seat (52.7 percent), but his new territory is much more Democratic; while Scott Peters (D-San Diego; District 50) would keep only 43.5 percent of his current constituency.

While these Democratic members would be in strong shape against a Republican, a series of strong Democratic candidates could pose individual threats to each.

Texas Redistricting:
Doggett/Casar Paired in New TX-37

To see this and more detailed maps and District breakdowns go to data.capitol.texas.gov.

By Jim Ellis — Monday, Aug. 18, 2025

House

With the Texas House Democrats likely returning to Austin this week for a new legislative special session, the Republican redistricting map appears set to become law.

The new plan is drawn in response to the US Justice Department informing the state leadership that a recent en banc 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decision pertaining to minority district composition made certain Texas congressional districts illegal.

For political reasons, Republicans are making the most of the redrawing opportunity to craft more favorable districts for their incumbents and candidates. With the Hispanic vote particularly in South Texas turning more GOP favorable, a new map has the potential of producing significant Republican gains.

A byproduct of the redraw is the pairing of several Democratic US House members in newly constructed districts. The one attracting the most attention occurs in Travis County, where Austin-based House members Lloyd Doggett and Greg Casar are preparing for a head-on battle to represent the new 37th CD, which is fully contained within the county and will be heavily Democratic.

Earlier this week, Rep. Doggett released an open letter to his key supporters informing them of his intention to run in new District 37 and suggesting Rep. Casar run in the new 35th District. The 35th contains none of Travis County and is anchored in San Antonio, but a district in which Casar currently sees an approximate 10 percent overlay between the population of his current CD and that part of the new TX-35.

Part of the new CD 35 configuration is similar to Rep. Casar’s current Austin-anchored district, but the addition of Republican voting counties east of San Antonio help create a significantly Hispanic seat that President Trump carried by approximately 10 percentage points.

Casar, who is currently the chairman of the House Progressive Caucus and served for seven years on the Austin City Council, quickly rejected Rep. Doggett’s suggestion. Therefore, we can expect both men to compete for new District 37.

The new 37th, however, is comprised mostly of Rep. Doggett’s territory from his current 37th CD. In the new configuration, 68 percent of the new TX-37’s populace is currently in Rep. Doggett’s domain versus just 32 percent who reside in Rep. Casar’s current district, according to The Down Ballot political blog researchers.

The Federal Election Commission 2nd Quarter disclosure reports also reveal another major Doggett edge. For the ’26 election cycle, Rep. Doggett has raised only a little over $130,000 but sits on a war chest of more than $6.2 million. Rep. Casar posted in excess of $264,000 raised for the current year and holds slightly over $450,000 in his campaign account, less than 10 percent of the money that Rep. Doggett commands.

The looming Doggett-Casar contest is another example of some Democratic primaries popping up around the country that pit an older incumbent against a young rising star. In this case, Rep. Doggett is 78 years old and will be 80 by the time of the next election. He has been a House member since 1995.

Prior to winning a congressional seat, Doggett served as a Justice of the Texas Supreme Court after initially winning election to the state Senate in a 1973 special election. He also ran unsuccessfully for the US Senate in 1984, losing to Republican Phil Gramm.

Casar, 36, was elected to the House in 2022 after taking his seat on the Austin City Council in 2014. An advantage he may have in the new 37th is the large Travis County Hispanic population. The new district configuration yields a Hispanic base of close to 38 percent, but the proportion will certainly be higher among likely Democratic primary voters. The remainder of the populace is comprised of approximately 44 percent Anglo residents, 10 percent who are Black, and eight percent Asian.

The Texas map also pairs Democratic members in two other districts. It is likely that Rep. Marc Veasey (D-Ft. Worth) would lose his Tarrant County power base and run in a new 33rd CD that is fully contained within Dallas County. It is possible that freshman Rep. Julie Johnson (D-Farmers Branch/Dallas), who faces only poor options for re-election, could run against Rep. Veasey.

In Houston, the winner of the November (and possibly early January election should the first vote lead to a runoff, which is likely) special election will have to immediately turn around and face veteran Rep. Al Green (D-Houston) in a new 18th CD that will contain a large portion of the Congressman’s current 9th District.

Once the map becomes law, incumbents and candidates will then make definitive decisions regarding the districts in which they will run.

Ex-Sen. Sherrod Brown Returns

By Jim Ellis — Thursday, Aug. 14, 2025

Senate

Former Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown (D)

Former Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown (D) announced earlier this week that he will return for a comeback attempt next year after losing his seat last November to Republican Bernie Moreno.

Though Brown is a prodigious fundraiser and has had a successful decades-long political career, the numbers suggest reversing his 2024 loss will be a formidable task.

Last November, now-Sen. Moreno defeated Brown by 206,434 votes, or a victory percentage margin of 50.1 – 46.5. What makes Brown’s task more difficult in 2026 is that he actually received more votes in his defeat than he did in winning his previous election, a 2018 re-election victory over then-Rep. Jim Renacci (R). The cumulative results suggest the state is undergoing a major electoral shift.

In 2018, then-Sen. Brown was re-elected to a third term with a 53.4 – 46.6 percent win over Renacci. In that election, he garnered 2,355,923 votes. In his losing 2024 campaign, Sen. Brown’s vote total was 2,650,949, or 295,026 votes more than he received in his 2018 winning campaign.

In reality, even though Brown increased his vote total from six years previously, the 2024 end result proved a major underperformance. Because the Ohio turnout in the 2024 presidential election year was 29.2 percent higher than in the 2018 mid-term election, Sen. Brown would have needed to increase his vote total by 690,914 votes just to keep pace with his winning vote ratio from seven years ago.

Therefore, even with growing his vote total in 2024, Brown’s vote performance as it relates to his previous victory was substantially deficient.

In terms of the Ohio political landscape, Sen. Brown carried only 16 of the state’s 88 counties in 2018, yet his margins were large enough in the big counties to record a comfortable victory. In 2024, the counties he carried were cut in half, dropping to just eight of the 88 local entities.

Comparing Sen. Brown’s county win totals to that of President Biden in the same election year of 2024, the latter man carried one less. Only Lorain County, which Brown represented when he was in the US House and state legislature, voted for him in 2024, but chose President Trump in the national election. The other seven Biden counties also voted for Brown. The same seven counties supported Biden in 2020.

The loyal Democratic counties are no surprise and begin with the entities housing the three cities known as Ohio’s “C-PAC,” Cincinnati (Hamilton County), Cleveland (Cuyahoga), and Columbus (Franklin). The other counties continuing to vote Democratic are Lucas (Toledo), Montgomery (Dayton), and Summit (Akron). The only rural county voting with the Democrats lies along the state’s southeastern border shared with West Virginia, Athens County.

Therefore, for Brown, or any other statewide Ohio Democrat, to gain traction, the party nominees will have to substantially increase their performance over what we saw in 2024 and even 2020.

Though his vote totals did not yield a re-election victory, Sen. Brown did oversee a very successful 2024 fundraising operation. His campaign raised just over $103 million for his failed re-election effort, which was the second highest of any US Senate candidate, behind only Texas Sen. Ted Cruz’s (R) $107-plus million from a state more than twice the size of Ohio.

In contrast, Moreno raised just less than $27 million, which included a personal loan of $4.5 million to his campaign account. Outside spending, however, evened the resource imbalance, accounting for over $190 million toward the Republican cause as compared to just beyond $95 million to assist the Democratic side.

After the 2024 campaign, Brown reported a cash-on-hand figure of $394,230. Since he has not, heretofore, become an official candidate, we will not see a Brown campaign financial disclosure statement until mid-October.

For his part, appointed Sen. Jon Husted (R) has had a robust fundraising spurt since assuming the office after then-Sen. J.D. Vance (R) departed to become Vice President. Sen. Husted has raised just over $3 million and reports $2.65 million in his campaign account.

Sen. Husted is also an accomplished Ohio politician. Before running as Lieutenant Governor on Gov. Mike DeWine’s (R) ticket in the past two gubernatorial statewide elections, Husted was twice elected as Ohio’s Secretary of State, won an election to the state Senate, and served four terms in the state House of Representatives, including four years as Speaker.

The 2026 Ohio campaign appears to be another Senate race where we can already identify the general election combatants. Watch for another very expensive campaign to unfold, but with Ohio’s move to the right, Sen. Husted should be considered the favored candidate. The 2026 special election winner will serve the balance of the current term and then be eligible to run for a six-year term in 2028.