Polling Series: New Pattern Emerges

By Jim Ellis

Aug. 14, 2019 — The HarrisX polling firm just completed conducting three rolling national Democratic presidential primary polls, and while they confirm other data finding former Vice President Joe Biden leading the race, he does so only in the low 30s. This is a number range far below what he needs to win a first-ballot nomination. The data does, however, reveal a new contender consistently placing second.

Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont

HarrisX conducted the survey trio from Aug. 7-12 that covered the periods of Aug. 7-10, 8-11, and 9-12. The sample sizes were substantial and almost identical in size, ranging from 1,346-1,350.

The HarrisX findings when compared with other recent polling yield a first-place finish for Biden. The three studies post him to a pair of 30 percent finishes and one 31 percent showing.

But, perhaps the more interesting placement comes in examining who finished second. In contrast with the conclusions of other national polls that show Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) placing definitively in second place, the HarrisX series finds Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) returning to that position.

The three polls project a consistent Biden-Sanders-Warren finish, with the leader scoring close to a 2:1 margin over his closest rival.

The research trifecta produced the following results:

Aug. 9-12; 1,346 registered or self-identified US Democratic voters
Biden 30%
Sanders 16%
Warren 10%
Harris 6%
Buttigieg 5%
O’Rourke 4%

Aug. 8-11; 1,350 registered or self-identified US Democratic voters
Biden 30%
Sanders 17%
Warren 9%
Harris 6%
Buttigieg 5%
O’Rourke 4%
Aug. 7-10; 1,350 registered or self-identified US Democratic voters
Biden 31%
Sanders 15%
Warren 9%
Harris 7%
Buttigieg 5%
O’Rourke 4%

There is no analysis that suggests why Sen. Warren seems to have dropped back while Sen. Sanders rebounds. It will be worth noting whether the coming mid-August polls also detect this change.

Two individual state polls were also released during the early August period, one much more credible than the other.

Change Research surveyed the important Nevada Caucus (Aug. 2-8; 439 likely Nevada caucus attenders), the third nomination event, which is scheduled for Feb. 22, 2020. In this presidential election, Nevada may play a more prominent role, since it could become a momentum gauge coming after the Iowa Caucus and New Hampshire primary and before the South Carolina primary and Super Tuesday.

Particularly if Biden were to under-perform in the first two events — a distinct possibility, because Iowa voters tend to favor the regional candidates and New Hampshire is in Sens. Sanders and Warren’s backyard as they hail from neighboring Vermont and Massachusetts, respectively — the Silver State could give him a springboard into the southern primaries, or send him on a downward spiral from which he might not recover.

According to the Change data, Biden would only forge a 26-23-22-10 percent lead over Sens. Warren, Sanders, and Harris, respectively. Such a finish would mean the top three finishers would qualify to split the state’s 36 first-ballot delegate votes. It is clear that Biden would have to exceed this survey’s results in order to form the necessary coalition to claim a first ballot victory at the Democratic National Convention next July.

The Sooner Poll of Oklahoma voters was also released, but the results here must be considered unreliable. Though it arrives at similar findings to those calculated in other southern states, the 152-person sample of likely Democratic primary voters gathered over a long 11-day sampling period (July 17-27) is simply too small to be considered statistically significant.

In any event, Biden would hold a better than 2:1 edge over Sen. Warren (26-12 percent), while Sen. Harris, South Bend Ind. Mayor Pete Buttigieg, and Sen. Sanders post 8-6-5 percent support figures, respectively. But, keep in mind, even Biden’s 26 percent support factor only translates into 40 respondents, while Sen. Sanders’ five percent means that just eight people indicated they would vote for him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *