Nevada’s Harry Reid Re-Emerges

By Jim Ellis

Feb. 5, 2021 — Former Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) is no longer in elective office, but it appears he’s still active in politics. Now, Reid has a new cause: making Nevada the first-in-the-nation presidential nomination contest.

Former Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (D-NV)

Reports suggest that the former party leader is lobbying Democratic officials to change the order of nomination voting. As we know, Iowa is the first caucus state to vote, followed by the New Hampshire primary. The Nevada caucus then follows, and then onto the South Carolina primary before Super Tuesday voting commences.

Reid, and others, are arguing that neither Iowa nor New Hampshire are representative of the core Democratic Party, and therefore should not receive the undue attention from being scheduled as the first caucus and primary despite tradition yielding such.

He points out that in 2020 the Iowa caucus system became colluded and poorly administered thus leading to a situation that even today it is unclear as to who actually won the caucus vote. While Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) received the most votes, it was former South Bend mayor and now US Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg who came away with the most delegates.

In New Hampshire, Reid contends that the eventual nominee, and of course general election winner, Joe Biden, placed fifth in the Granite State Democratic primary before his candidacy was rescued with a big primary win in South Carolina. He fails to mention, however, that Biden also lost Nevada, coming in a poor second to Sen. Sanders (40-19 percent) and just ahead of Buttigieg’s 17 percent.

Since 1952, there have been 13 New Hampshire Democratic presidential primaries in races that did not involve a party incumbent. In only five of those campaigns did the Granite State voters back the eventual party nominee. The last time the state chose a nominee who went onto win an open or challenge race for the Presidency occurred in 1976. In that year, Jimmy Carter won the New Hampshire primary, and then proceeded to unseat then-President Gerald Ford in a close general election.

In reality, however, South Carolina may actually have the best argument about moving into the first primary position. The South Carolina presidential primary system began in 1988. Since then, the state has hosted seven such Democratic elections where no president of their party was seeking re-election. In its history, the eventual party nominee has won five of the seven Palmetto State presidential primaries.

The Republican result is even better. In six of the seven non-incumbent primaries the eventual GOP presidential nominee won the South Carolina primary. In almost each situation, the Palmetto vote was the key factor in those candidates gaining the necessary momentum going into Super Tuesday, a dynamic that proves to be the lynchpin to a national party victory.

House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-SC) is already making some of the aforementioned counter arguments to the Nevada push, and the new Democratic National Committee chairman, a former state Democratic Party chairman and unsuccessful US Senate candidate, Jaime Harrison, also hails from South Carolina.

Obviously, much time remains before decisions such as these must be made in preparation for another presidential campaign. In this period of ever-lengthening presidential campaigns and a shortening of the time between national nominations, however, it is not too soon to begin laying the groundwork to change party rules.

However, the state in the driver’s seat is still New Hampshire. Regardless of what a party rule might pronounce, a state law is the final authority as to how the elections are conducted in a particular domain. In the Granite State, the legislators and governor long ago gave absolute power to Secretary of State William Gardner to schedule the presidential primary election at will.

This means he can move the primary date on a moment’s notice for the purpose of always placing the state at least seven days before any entity that attempts to jump in front. At least in the early going, it appears this particular New Hampshire law may factor prominently once the 2024 presidential effort begins.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *